ArticleHeliyon2023
Determinants of meeting the minimum acceptable diet among children aged 6 to 23 months in Bangladesh: Evidence from a national representative cross-sectional study.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Minimum acceptable diet and contributing factors among children aged 6-23 months in Afghanistan: insights from the 2022-2023 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey.BMC nutrition · 2025Article
- Article
- Minimum acceptable diet and associated factors among 6-23 months old children enrolled in outpatient therapeutic program in the Tulla district, Sidama region, Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Article
- Minimum acceptable diet and its predictors among children aged 6-23 months in Ethiopia. A multilevel cloglog regression analysis.Maternal & child nutrition · 2024Article
- Minimum acceptable diet use and its associated factors among children aged 6-23 in Ghana: a mixed effect analysis using Ghana Demographic and Health Survey.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Geospatial pattern of level of minimum acceptable diet and its determinants among children aged 6-23 months in Ethiopia. Spatial and multiscale geographically weighted regression analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Minimum acceptable diet (MAD) is a core indicator of infant and child feeding practices (IYCF). Meeting the MAD is essential to enhance the nutritional status of children aged 6-23 months. Objective: To identify the determinants of meeting the MAD among children aged 6-23 months in Bangladesh. Methods: The study was based on a secondary dataset of the 2017-2018 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS 2017-18). Complete (weighted) data from 2,426 children aged 6-23 months were analyzed. Results: The overall percentage of meeting the MAD was 34.70%, whereas, in terms of urban and rural, it was 39.56% and 32.96%, respectively. Age of the children 9-11 months [Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.54; 95% CI: 2.33-5.4], 12-17 months [AOR = 6.72; 95% CI: 4.63-9.77], and 18-23 months [AOR = 7.12; 95% CI: 1.72-5.98], the maternal primary [AOR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.07-2.86], secondary [AOR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.36-3.89], and higher education [AOR = 3.21; 95% CI: 1.72-5.98], currently working mothers [AOR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.13-1.79], mothers' access to mass media [AOR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1-1.66], and at least four antenatal care (ANC) from medically skilled providers [AOR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.39,2.18] were independent determinants of meeting the MAD. Conclusions: Many children are still far behind in meeting the MAD. Nutritional interventions like improved nutrition recipes, nutrition education and homemade food supplementation, nutritional counseling by home visits, community mobilization, health forums, antenatal and postnatal sessions, and media campaigns on IYCF are needed to meet MAD practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.