Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37416671›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

A state-of-the-art review of image motion deblurring techniques in precision agriculture.

Yu Huihui, Li Daoliang, Chen Yingyi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu HuihuiSchool of Information Science & Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, PR China.
Li DaoliangNational Innovation Center for Digital Fishery, Beijing, 100083, PR China.
Chen YingyiNational Innovation Center for Digital Fishery, Beijing, 100083, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image motion deblurring is a crucial technology in computer vision that has gained significant attention attracted by its outstanding ability for accurate acquisition of motion image information, processing and intelligent decision making, etc. Motion blur has recently been considered as one of the major challenges for applications of computer vision in precision agriculture. Motion blurred images seriously affect the accuracy of information acquisition in precision agriculture scene image such as testing, tracking, and behavior analysis of animals, recognition of plant phenotype, critical characteristics of pests and diseases, etc. On the other hand, the fast motion and irregular deformation of agriculture livings, and motion of image capture device all introduce great challenges for image motion deblurring. Hence, the demand of more efficient image motion deblurring method is rapidly increasing and developing in the applications with dynamic scene. Up till now, some studies have been carried out to address this challenge, e.g., spatial motion blur, multi-scale blur and other types of blur. This paper starts with categorization of causes of image blur in precision agriculture. Then, it gives detail introduction of general-purpose motion deblurring methods and their the strengthen and weakness. Furthermore, these methods are compared for the specific applications in precision agriculture e.g., detection and tracking of livestock animal, harvest sorting and grading, and plant disease detection and phenotyping identification etc. Finally, future research directions are discussed to push forward the research and application of advancing in precision agriculture image motion deblurring field.

Indexed as

Blur kernelDeep learningMotion blurred imageMotion deblurringPrecision agriculture

Identifiers

PMID37416671
PMCPMC10320030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.