Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37416511›Full record

ReviewVascular health and risk management2023

Pulmonary Valve Stenosis: From Diagnosis to Current Management Techniques and Future Prospects.

Federico Marchini, Sofia Meossi, Giulia Passarini, Gianluca Campo, Rita Pavasini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Federico MarchiniCardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Sofia MeossiCardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Giulia PassariniCardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Gianluca CampoCardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Rita PavasiniCardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1763-9711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary stenosis (PS) is mainly a congenital defect that accounts for 7-12% of congenital heart diseases (CHD). It can be isolated or, more frequently, associated with other congenital defects (25-30%) involving anomalies of the pulmonary vascular tree. For the diagnosis of PS an integrated approach with echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is of paramount importance for the planning of the interventional treatment. In recent years, transcatheter approaches for the treatment of PS have increased however, meaning surgery is a possible option for complicated cases with anatomy not suitable for percutaneous treatment. The present review aims to summarize current knowledge regarding diagnosis and treatment of PS.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Valve StenosisEchocardiographyHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingpercutaneous treatmentpulmonary valve stenosisvalvotomyvalvuloplasty

Identifiers

PMID37416511
PMCPMC10320808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.