Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37416491›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2023

Efficient method for

Antonio De Souza Braga Neto, Baptiste Rigaud, Guillaume Mériguet, Anne-Laure Rollet, Juliette Sirieix-Plénet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonio De Souza Braga NetoPhysicochimie des Electrolytes et Nanosystèmes interfaciaux (PHENIX), Sorbonne Université, 4 Place Jussieu, Paris F-75005, France.
Baptiste RigaudFédération de Chimie et Matériaux de Paris Centre, Sorbonne Université, 4 Place Jussieu, Paris F-75005, France.
Guillaume MériguetPhysicochimie des Electrolytes et Nanosystèmes interfaciaux (PHENIX), Sorbonne Université, 4 Place Jussieu, Paris F-75005, France.
Anne-Laure RolletPhysicochimie des Electrolytes et Nanosystèmes interfaciaux (PHENIX), Sorbonne Université, 4 Place Jussieu, Paris F-75005, France.
Juliette Sirieix-PlénetPhysicochimie des Electrolytes et Nanosystèmes interfaciaux (PHENIX), Sorbonne Université, 4 Place Jussieu, Paris F-75005, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the method is to allow agitation and fast homogenization of liquid systems in NMR tubes, directly inside the NMR spectrometer. The setup makes it possible to record spectra of samples that are macroscopically not stable, as dispersions of large particles. It makes also possible to fasten the homogeneization of liquid during a reaction or a phase transition. In the present paper, the method has been evaluated using homogeneous liquid extraction (HLLE). This configuration can also be used to introduce gases in different systems to perform various types of experiments. The set up consists in a Teflon tube inserted in the NMR tube bringing gas that yields agitation by bubbling. The gas flow is tuned using an electronically operated valve connected to gas line and to the NMR console. The method details how to reach proper homogenization without any perturbation, as liquid leaks.•An easy method for agitation of liquids inside NMR spectrometers.•The set up can be used for the insertion of gases in the NMR tube inside the spectrometer.•The method allows the study of the mixing of biphasic systems by NMR techniques.

Indexed as

Agitation method for samples inside NMR spectrometerIn situ agitationIonic liquidsLiquid-liquid extractionLocalized spectroscopy (LOCSY)NMRSample homogenisation

Identifiers

PMID37416491
PMCPMC10320592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.