Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37416314›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2023

Application of vagus nerve stimulation on the rehabilitation of upper limb dysfunction after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xu Wang, Qixin Ding, Tianshu Li, Wanyue Li, Jialin Yin, Yakun Li, Yuefang Li, Weisheng Zhuang

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xu WangSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Qixin DingSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Tianshu LiSchool of Clinical Medicine, Henan University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wanyue LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jialin YinDepartment of Rehabilitation, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Yakun LiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuefang LiSchool of Clinical Medicine, Henan University, Zhengzhou, China.
Weisheng ZhuangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Henan Provincial People's Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Henan University · CNHenan University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to elucidate the efficacy, safety, and long-term implications of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a viable therapeutic option for patients with upper limb dysfunction following a stroke. Methods: Data from the following libraries were searched from inception to December 2022: PubMed, Wanfang, Scopus, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Embase, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine Disc, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Outcomes included indicators of upper limb motor function, indicators of prognosis, and indicators of safety (incidence of adverse events [AEs] and serious AEs [SAEs]). Two of the authors extracted the data independently. A third researcher arbitrated when disputes occurred. The quality of each eligible study was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Meta-analysis and bias analysis were performed using Stata (version 16.0) and RevMan (version 5.3). Results: Ten trials (VNS combined with rehabilitation group vs. no or sham VNS combined with rehabilitation group) with 335 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Regarding upper extremity motor function, based on Fugl-Meyer assessment scores, VNS combined with other treatment options had immediate (mean difference [MD] = 2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.78-3.91, Conclusion: VNS is an effective and safe treatment for upper extremity motor dysfunction after a stroke. For the functional restoration of the upper extremities, noninvasive integrated therapy and lower-frequency VNS may be more effective. In the future, further high-quality studies with larger study populations, more comprehensive indicators, and thorough data are required to advance the clinical application of VNS. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42023399820.

Indexed as

meta-analysisrehabilitationstrokeupper limb dysfunctionvagus nerve stimulation (vns)

Identifiers

PMID37416314
PMCPMC10321132
OpenAlexW4381662059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.