Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37416082›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023

Modeling biological individuality using machine learning: A study on human gait.

Fabian Horst, Djordje Slijepcevic, Marvin Simak, Brian Horsak, Wolfgang Immanuel Schöllhorn, Matthias Zeppelzauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recognition of Human Gait Under Asymmetric Loading.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabian HorstDepartment of Training and Movement Science, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Djordje SlijepcevicInstitute of Creative Media Technologies, Department of Media & Digital Technologies, St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences, St. Pölten, Austria.
Marvin SimakDepartment of Training and Movement Science, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Brian HorsakCenter for Digital Health & Social Innovation, Department of Health Sciences, St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences, St. Pölten, Austria.
Wolfgang Immanuel SchöllhornDepartment of Training and Movement Science, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Matthias ZeppelzauerInstitute of Creative Media Technologies, Department of Media & Digital Technologies, St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences, St. Pölten, Austria.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Applied Sciences St Pölten · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human gait is a complex and unique biological process that can offer valuable insights into an individual's health and well-being. In this work, we leverage a machine learning-based approach to model individual gait signatures and identify factors contributing to inter-individual variability in gait patterns. We provide a comprehensive analysis of gait individuality by (1) demonstrating the uniqueness of gait signatures in a large-scale dataset and (2) highlighting the gait characteristics that are most distinctive to each individual. We utilized the data from three publicly available datasets comprising 5368 bilateral ground reaction force recordings during level overground walking from 671 distinct healthy individuals. Our results show that individuals can be identified with a prediction accuracy of 99.3% by using the bilateral signals of all three ground reaction force components, with only 10 out of 1342 recordings in our test data being misclassified. This indicates that the combination of bilateral ground reaction force signals with all three components provides a more comprehensive and accurate representation of an individual's gait signature. The highest accuracy was achieved by (linear) Support Vector Machines (99.3%), followed by Random Forests (98.7%), Convolutional Neural Networks (95.8%), and Decision Trees (82.8%). The proposed approach provides a powerful tool to better understand biological individuality and has potential applications in personalized healthcare, clinical diagnosis, and therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

BiomechanicsExplainable artificial intelligenceForce-based gait recognitionGround reaction forcesHuman gait recognitionLayer-wise relevance propagation

Identifiers

PMID37416082
PMCPMC10319823
OpenAlexW4380854452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.