Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37416026›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Clinical Equivalence of Trusynth® and Vicryl® Polyglactin 910 Sutures for Subcutaneous Tissue Closure During Cesarean Delivery: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Prema DCunha, Kranti P Silpa, Sameera M Gadwalker, Ashok K Moharana, Deepak Ts

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Prema DCunhaObstetrics and Gynecology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangaluru, IND.
Kranti P SilpaObstetrics and Gynecology, CARE Hospitals, Telangana, IND.
Sameera M GadwalkerObstetrics and Gynecology, CARE Hospitals, Telangana, IND.
Ashok K MoharanaClinical Affairs, Healthium Medtech, Bengaluru, IND.
Deepak TsClinical Affairs, Healthium Medtech, Bengaluru, IND.
Father Muller Medical College Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Post-cesarean complications such as surgical site infection (SSI), bleeding, and dehiscence may occur after cesarean delivery. Subcutaneous tissue closure will reduce these complications. With this background, this study assessed the clinical equivalence of Trusynth® and Vicryl® polyglactin 910 sutures for subcutaneous tissue closure. Methods In this randomized, single-blind study (from January 5, 2021 to December 24, 2021), a total of 113 women with a singleton pregnancy scheduled for cesarean section were included in the study and randomized to Trusynth® (n=57) and Vicryl® (n=56) group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of subcutaneous abdominal wound disruption within six weeks of cesarean delivery. The secondary endpoints included postoperative complications (SSI, hematoma, seroma, and skin disruptions), operative time, intraoperative handling characteristics, postoperative pain, hospital stay, time taken to return to normal activities, suture removal, microbial deposits on sutures, and adverse events. Results No incidence of subcutaneous abdominal wound disruption was recorded. Non-significant differences in intraoperative handling parameters (except memory, p=0.007), postoperative pain, skin disruption, SSI, hematoma, seroma, hospital stay, and time to return to normal activities were observed between Trusynth® and Vicryl® groups. Conclusion Both Trusynth® and Vicryl® polyglactin 910 sutures can be regarded as clinically equivalent. These are safe and effective for subcutaneous tissue closure during cesarean section with minimal risk of subcutaneous abdominal wound disruptions.

Indexed as

cesarean deliverypolyglactin 910 suturesskin disruptionssubcutaneous abdominal wound disruptiontissue closure

Identifiers

PMID37416026
PMCPMC10321360
OpenAlexW4379468525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.