ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2023
Performance comparison of bio-inspired and learning-based clustering analysis with machine learning techniques for classification of EEG signals.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-Domain Feature Fusion and Channel Attention in an Inception-Based Architecture for Motor Imagery EEG Decoding.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Ensemble Fusion Models Using Various Strategies and Machine Learning for EEG Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A comprehensive analysis of an automated system for epileptic seizure detection is explained in this work. When a seizure occurs, it is quite difficult to differentiate the non-stationary patterns from the discharges occurring in a rhythmic manner. The proposed approach deals with it efficiently by clustering it initially for the sake of feature extraction by using six different techniques categorized under two different methods, e.g., bio-inspired clustering and learning-based clustering. Learning-based clustering includes K-means clusters and Fuzzy C-means (FCM) clusters, while bio-inspired clusters include Cuckoo search clusters, Dragonfly clusters, Firefly clusters, and Modified Firefly clusters. Clustered values were then classified with 10 suitable classifiers, and after the performance comparison analysis of the EEG time series, the results proved that this methodology flow achieved a good performance index and a high classification accuracy. A comparatively higher classification accuracy of 99.48% was achieved when Cuckoo search clusters were utilized with linear support vector machines (SVM) for epilepsy detection. A high classification accuracy of 98.96% was obtained when K-means clusters were classified with a naive Bayesian classifier (NBC) and Linear SVM, and similar results were obtained when FCM clusters were classified with Decision Trees yielding the same values. The comparatively lowest classification accuracy, at 75.5%, was obtained when Dragonfly clusters were classified with the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier, and the second lowest classification accuracy of 75.75% was obtained when Firefly clusters were classified with NBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.