Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37415849›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genome editing2023

Regulation and safety measures for nanotechnology-based agri-products.

Ritika Kumari, Kalpana Suman, Swagata Karmakar, Vandana Mishra, Sameer Gunjan Lakra, Gunjan Kumar Saurav, Binod Kumar Mahto

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genome editing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ritika KumariUniversity Department of Botany, Ranchi University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Kalpana SumanUniversity Department of Botany, Ranchi University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Swagata KarmakarBioresources and Environmental Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Environmental Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Vandana MishraBioresources and Environmental Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Environmental Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Sameer Gunjan LakraDepartment of Botany, J. N. College, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Gunjan Kumar SauravDepartment of Zoology, Rajiv Gandhi University, Doimukh, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
Binod Kumar MahtoUniversity Department of Botany, Ranchi University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Ranchi University · INUniversity of Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a wide range of application for nanotechnology in agriculture, including fertilizers, aquaculture, irrigation, water filtration, animal feed, animal vaccines, food processing, and packaging. In recent decades, nanotechnology emerged as a prospective and promising approach for the advancement of Agri-sector such as pest/disease prevention, fertilizers, agrochemicals, biofertilizers, bio-stimulants, post-harvest storage, pheromones-, and nutrient-delivery, and genetic manipulation in plants for crop improvement by using nanomaterial as a carrier system. Exponential increase in global population has enhanced food demand, so to fulfil the demand markets already included nano-based product likewise nano-encapsulated nutrients/agrochemicals, antimicrobial and packaging of food. For the approval of nano-based product, applicants for a marketing approval must show that such novel items can be used safely without endangering the consumer and environment. Several nations throughout the world have been actively looking at whether their regulatory frameworks are suitable for handling nanotechnologies. As a result, many techniques to regulate nano-based products in agriculture, feed, and food have been used. Here, we have contextualized different regulatory measures of several countries for nano-based products in agriculture, from feed to food, including guidance and legislation for safety assessment worldwide.

Indexed as

agri-productnanocarriernanotechnologypeptidecarrierregulationsafety measures

Identifiers

PMID37415849
PMCPMC10320728
OpenAlexW4381660805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.