Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37415843›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Development and validation of an artificial intelligence model for the early classification of the aetiology of meningitis and encephalitis: a retrospective observational study.

Bo Kyu Choi, Young Jo Choi, MinDong Sung, WooSeok Ha, Min Kyung Chu, Won-Joo Kim, Kyoung Heo, Kyung Min Kim, Yu Rang Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bo Kyu ChoiDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Jo ChoiDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
MinDong SungDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
WooSeok HaDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Min Kyung ChuDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won-Joo KimDepartment of Neurology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung HeoDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Min KimDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yu Rang ParkDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are essential in meningitis and encephalitis management. We aimed to implement and verify an artificial intelligence (AI) model for early aetiological determination of patients with encephalitis and meningitis, and identify important variables in the classification process. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, patients older than 18 years old with meningitis or encephalitis at two centres in South Korea were enrolled for development (n = 283) and external validation (n = 220) of AI models, respectively. Their clinical variables within 24 h after admission were used for the multi-classification of four aetiologies including autoimmunity, bacteria, virus, and tuberculosis. The aetiology was determined based on the laboratory test results of cerebrospinal fluid conducted during hospitalization. Model performance was assessed using classification metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), recall, precision, accuracy, and F1 score. Comparisons were performed between the AI model and three clinicians with varying neurology experience. Several techniques (eg, Shapley values, F score, permutation feature importance, and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations weights) were used for the explainability of the AI model. Findings: Between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2021, 283 patients were enrolled in the training/test dataset. An ensemble model with extreme gradient boosting and TabNet showed the best performance among the eight AI models with various settings in the external validation dataset (n = 220); accuracy, 0.8909; precision, 0.8987; recall, 0.8909; F1 score, 0.8948; AUROC, 0.9163. The AI model outperformed all clinicians who achieved a maximum F1 score of 0.7582, by demonstrating a performance of F1 score greater than 0.9264. Interpretation: This is the first multiclass classification study for the early determination of the aetiology of meningitis and encephalitis based on the initial 24-h data using an AI model, which showed high performance metrics. Future studies can improve upon this model by securing and inputting time-series variables and setting various features about patients, and including a survival analysis for prognosis prediction. Funding: MD-PhD/Medical Scientist Training Program through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceAutoimmune encephalitisMeningitisNeuroinflammationTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID37415843
PMCPMC10319989
OpenAlexW4381613210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.