ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
SAELGMDA: Identifying human microbe-disease associations based on sparse autoencoder and LightGBM.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finding potential lncRNA-disease associations using a boosting-based ensemble learning model.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- The causal association between gut microbiota and postpartum depression: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Predicting microbe-disease associations via graph neural network and contrastive learning.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Identification of complex associations between diseases and microbes is important to understand the pathogenesis of diseases and design therapeutic strategies. Biomedical experiment-based Microbe-Disease Association (MDA) detection methods are expensive, time-consuming, and laborious. Methods: Here, we developed a computational method called SAELGMDA for potential MDA prediction. First, microbe similarity and disease similarity are computed by integrating their functional similarity and Gaussian interaction profile kernel similarity. Second, one microbe-disease pair is presented as a feature vector by combining the microbe and disease similarity matrices. Next, the obtained feature vectors are mapped to a low-dimensional space based on a Sparse AutoEncoder. Finally, unknown microbe-disease pairs are classified based on Light Gradient boosting machine. Results: The proposed SAELGMDA method was compared with four state-of-the-art MDA methods (MNNMDA, GATMDA, NTSHMDA, and LRLSHMDA) under five-fold cross validations on diseases, microbes, and microbe-disease pairs on the HMDAD and Disbiome databases. The results show that SAELGMDA computed the best accuracy, Matthews correlation coefficient, AUC, and AUPR under the majority of conditions, outperforming the other four MDA prediction models. In particular, SAELGMDA obtained the best AUCs of 0.8358 and 0.9301 under cross validation on diseases, 0.9838 and 0.9293 under cross validation on microbes, and 0.9857 and 0.9358 under cross validation on microbe-disease pairs on the HMDAD and Disbiome databases. Colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, and lung cancer are diseases that severely threat human health. We used the proposed SAELGMDA method to find possible microbes for the three diseases. The results demonstrate that there are potential associations between Conclusion: We anticipate that the proposed SAELGMDA method contributes to the identification of new MDAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.