Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37415746›Full record

ArticleCancer research communications2023

Evaluating Work Impairment as a Source of Financial Toxicity in Cancer Healthcare and Negative Impacts on Health Status.

Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam, Nicole Nollen, Jo Wick, Dorothy Hughes, Danny Welch, Elizabeth Calhoun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dinesh Pal MudaranthakamDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.ORCID 0000-0001-9767-1158
Nicole NollenDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.ORCID 0000-0002-0943-0061
Jo WickDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.ORCID 0000-0003-3445-3211
Dorothy HughesDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.ORCID 0000-0002-8952-450X
Danny WelchUniversity of Kansas Comprehensive Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas.ORCID 0000-0002-1951-4947
Elizabeth CalhounDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.ORCID 0000-0002-2532-8040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How the socioeconomic factors intersect for a particular patient can determine their susceptibility to financial toxicity, what costs they will encounter during treatment, the type and quality of their care, and the potential work impairments they face. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate financial factors leading to worsening health outcomes by the cancer subtype. A logistic model predicting worsening health outcomes while assessing the most influential economic factors was constructed by the University of Michigan Health and Retirement Study. A forward stepwise regression procedure was implemented to identify the social risk factors that impact health status. Stepwise regression was done on data subsets based on the cancer types of lung, breast, prostate, and colon cancer to determine whether significant predictors of worsening health status were different or the same across cancer types. Independent covariate analysis was also conducted to cross-validate our model. On the basis of the model fit statistics, the two-factor model has the best fit, that is, the lowest AIC among potential models of 3270.56, percent concordance of 64.7, and a C-statistics of 0.65. The two-factor model used work impairment and out-of-pocket costs, significantly contributing to worsening health outcomes. Covariate analysis demonstrated that younger patients with cancer experienced more financial burdens leading to worsening health outcomes than elderly patients aged 65 years and above. Work impairment and high out-of-pocket costs were significantly associated with worsening health outcomes among cancer patients. Matching the participants who need the most financial help with appropriate resources is essential to mitigate the financial burden. Significance: Among patients with cancer, work impairment and out-of-pocket are the two primary factors contributing to adverse health outcomes. Women, African American or other races, the Hispanic population, and younger individuals have encountered higher work impairment and out-of-pocket costs due to cancer than their counterparts.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsFinancial StressAgedCost of IllnessDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth StatusHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID37415746
PMCPMC10321355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.