Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37415705›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in public health2023

Effect of agility ladder training with a cognitive task (dual task) on physical and cognitive functions: a randomized study.

Vivian Castillo de Lima, Luz Albany Arcila Castaño, Ricardo Aurélio Carvalho Sampaio, Priscila Yukari Sewo Sampaio, Camila Vieira Ligo Teixeira, Marco Carlos Uchida

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vivian Castillo de Lima *Laboratory of Applied Kinesiology, Faculty of Physical Education, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Luz Albany Arcila Castaño *Laboratory of Applied Kinesiology, Faculty of Physical Education, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Ricardo Aurélio Carvalho SampaioDepartment of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Brazil.
Priscila Yukari Sewo SampaioDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Brazil.
Camila Vieira Ligo TeixeiraNIH Biomedical Research Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Marco Carlos UchidaLaboratory of Applied Kinesiology, Faculty of Physical Education, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Agility training (AT) is used to improve neuromuscular performance and dynamic balance, which are crucial for the physical function of older adults. Activities of daily living, which decrease with age, involve tasks that simultaneously require motor, and cognitive abilities and can be considered dual tasks. Methods: This study investigates a training program's physical and cognitive effects using an agility ladder on healthy older adults. This program consisted of 30-min sessions twice per week and lasted for 14 weeks. The physical training included four different sequences with progressive difficulty levels, while the cognitive training (CT) included different verbal fluency (VF) tasks for each physical task. Sixteen participants (mean age of 66.9 ± 5.0 years) were allocated to two groups: AT alone (AT) and dual-task training (AT combined with CT [AT + CT]). Assessments were performed before and after 14 weeks of interventions using physical functional tests (e.g., Illinois agility test, five times sit-to-stand test, timed up and go [TUG], and one-leg stand) and cognitive tests (cognitive TUG, verbal fluency, attention, and scenery picture memory test). Results: After this period, both groups had significant differences in physical performance, muscle power, agility, static and dynamic balance, and short-term memory, whereas only the AT + CT group improved phonological verbal fluency, executive function (TUG combined with a cognitive task), attention (trail-making test-B), and short-term memory (scenery picture memory test). Conclusion: Indicating that only the group that received direct cognitive training had better enhanced cognitive function. Clinical trial registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: RBR-7t7gnjk.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCognitionAgedExecutive FunctionHealth StatusHumansMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy Modalitiesagingcognitive functiondual-taskexecutive functionphysical function

Identifiers

PMID37415705
PMCPMC10321527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.