ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
Rationing in healthcare-a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balancing access to donor human milk: Rationing vs expanding use.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026Review
- Ozempic and Wegovy Meet Congress: Political Economy Without Critique and Sociology Without Society.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2026Article
- Balancing the impact of socio-ethical and economic considerations on clinical-hospital decision-making.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards postmenopausal osteoporosis among postmenopausal women: A cross-sectional study.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- 'At a tipping point': a comparative analysis of oral health coverage for children across six European countries: Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Scotland, and Spain.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Clinical decision-making process and distributive justice: The mediating role of economic analysis. Empirical evidence from Italy.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- From awareness to action: investigating the impact of big-five teamwork model awareness on rationing of nursing care and patient-centered care.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Unravelling Education Needs for Clinical Practice Guideline Development: A Survey Performed in the Netherlands.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- [Prevention in old age : A missed opportunity in times of demographic change?]Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2024Article
- To scan or not to scan? A retrospective cohort study analysing the efficacy of routine post-operative CT after brain biopsy.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Staff Resources in Public and Private Hospitals and Their Implication for Medical Practice: A French Study of Caesareans.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Assessing social protection influence on health status in the European Union.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Rationing of nursing care in Internal Medicine Departments-a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare rationing has been the subject of numerous debates and concerns in the field of health economics in recent years. It is a concept which refers to the allocation of scarce healthcare resources and involves the use of different approaches to the delivery of health services and patient care. Regardless of the approach used, healthcare rationing fundamentally involves withholding potentially beneficial programs and/or treatments from certain people. As the demands placed on health services continue to rise and with that significant increases to the cost, healthcare rationing has become increasingly popular and is deemed necessary for the delivery of affordable, patient-care services. However, public discourse on this issue has largely been centered on ethical considerations with less focus on economic rationality. Establishing the economic rationality of healthcare rationing is essential in healthcare decision-making and consideration of its adoption by healthcare authorities and organizations. This scoping review of seven articles demonstrates that the economic rationality of healthcare rationing is the scarcity of healthcare resources amidst increased demand and costs. Therefore, supply, demand, and benefits are at the core of healthcare rationing practices and influence decisions on its suitability. Given the increased costs of care and resource scarcity, healthcare rationing is a suitable practice towards ensuring healthcare resources are allocated to people in a rational, equitable, and cost-effective manner. The rising costs and demands for care place significant pressure on healthcare authorities to identify suitable strategies for the allocation of healthcare resources. Healthcare rationing as a priority-setting strategy would support healthcare authorities identify mechanisms to allocate scarce resources in a cost-effective manner. When used in the context of a priority-setting approach, healthcare rationing helps healthcare organizations and practitioners to ensure that patient populations achieve maximum benefits at reasonable costs. It represents a fair allocation of healthcare resources to all populations, especially in low-income settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.