Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37415699›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Evaluation of Monkeypox- and Vaccinia virus-neutralizing antibodies in human serum samples after vaccination and natural infection.

Alessandro Manenti, Niccolò Solfanelli, Paolo Cantaloni, Livia Mazzini, Margherita Leonardi, Linda Benincasa, Giulia Piccini, Serena Marchi, Martina Boncioli, Chiara Spertilli Raffaelli and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Plausible reasons for the resurgence of Mpox (formerly Monkeypox): an overview.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro ManentiVisMederi Srl, Siena, Italy.
Niccolò SolfanelliVisMederi Srl, Siena, Italy.
Paolo CantaloniVisMederi Srl, Siena, Italy.
Livia MazziniVisMederi Srl, Siena, Italy.
Margherita LeonardiVisMederi Srl, Siena, Italy.
Linda BenincasaVisMederi Research Srl, Siena, Italy.
Giulia PicciniVisMederi Srl, Siena, Italy.
Serena MarchiDepartment of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Martina BoncioliVisMederi Research Srl, Siena, Italy.
Chiara Spertilli RaffaelliDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Ospedale San Donato, Arezzo, Italy.
Danilo TacconiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Ospedale San Donato, Arezzo, Italy.
Giada MattiuzzoMedicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, South Mimms, United Kingdom.
Otfried KistnerVisMederi Srl, Siena, Italy.
Emanuele MontomoliVisMederi Srl, Siena, Italy.
Claudia Maria TrombettaVisMederi Research Srl, Siena, Italy.
VisMederi Research · ITOspedale San Donato · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In early to mid-2022, an unexpected outbreak of Monkeypox virus infections occurred outside the African endemic regions. Vaccines originally developed in the past to protect against smallpox are one of the available countermeasures to prevent and protect against Methods: Given the complexity of Orthopoxviruses, the microneutralization assay was performed in such a way as to uncover a potential role of complement, with and without the addition of an external source of Baby Rabbit Complement. A set of human serum samples from individuals who had been naturally infected with Monkeypox virus and individuals who may have and not have undergone vaccinia virus vaccinations, was used to evaluate the performance, sensitivity, and specificity of the assay. Results and conclusions: The results of the present study confirm the presence and cross-reactivity of antibodies elicited by vaccinia-based vaccines, which proved able to neutralize the Monkeypox virus in the presence of an external source of complement.

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxSmallpox VaccineVacciniaAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralHumansMonkeypox virusVaccinationVaccinia virusAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralSmallpox Vaccineepidemiologyhumoral immunityMonkeypox virusneutralizationvaccinia virus

Identifiers

PMID37415699
PMCPMC10321151
OpenAlexW4381664434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.