Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37415687›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Evaluation of a male-specific psychotherapeutic program for major depressive disorder compared to cognitive behavioral therapy and waitlist: study protocol for a six-arm randomized clinical superiority trial examining depressed eugonadal and hypogonadal men receiving testosterone.

Andreas Walther, Ulrike Ehlert, Michèle Schneeberger, Lukas Eggenberger, Christoph Flückiger, Nikola Komlenac, Adrian Heald, Timothy Rice, Simona Palm, Zac E Seidler and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05435222 (Evaluation of a Male-specific Psychotherapeutic Program for Major Depressive Disorders Compared to Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05435222 narecruitingnot on this map

Evaluation of a Male-specific Psychotherapeutic Program for Major Depressive Disorders Compared to Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: a Randomized Controlled Superiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAndreas WaltherRan2023 to 2025Enrolled244ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsMale-specific psychotherapeutic program (MSPP), Cognitive beahvioral therapy (CBT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Andreas WaltherDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ulrike EhlertDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michèle SchneebergerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lukas EggenbergerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph FlückigerDepartment of Psychology, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Nikola KomlenacInstitute of Diversity in Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Adrian HealdDepartment of Endocrinology, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Timothy RiceDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Simona PalmDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Zac E SeidlerOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
John S OgrodniczukDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
John L OliffeSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Simon M RiceOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
David KealyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Rainer WeberFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic and Polyclinic for Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
David ZimmermannAndrology and Urology Centre, Uroviva Network, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHUniversity of British Columbia · CAIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USInnsbruck Medical University · ATOliva (Switzerland) · CHOrygen · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Kassel · DEUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in men is complicated by the endorsement of traditional masculinity ideologies (TMI) often leading to reluctance toward psychotherapy, therapy interfering processes, or premature termination. In addition, it has been shown that men with MDD have a significantly increased risk of being hypogonadal (e.g., total testosterone levels <12.1 nmoL/L). Therefore, it is recommended to examine depressed men with regard to their testosterone status and if hypogonadism is present to combine psychotherapy with testosterone treatment (TT). Aim: This project aims to evaluate a male-specific psychotherapeutic program (MSPP) for MDD in depressed eugonadal and hypogonadal men receiving testosterone in comparison to a standard cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for MDD and a Waitlist. Methods: The study presents a 2×3 factorial study design. In total, 144 men aged between 25 and 50 will be stratified by testosterone status (eugonadal/hypogonadal) and then randomized into one of the three conditions (MSPP, CBT, or Waitlist). Additionally, a healthy control group of 100 men will be recruited, which will undergo only baseline assessments. Both standardized psychotherapy programs will encompass 18 sessions delivered in a weekly manner. Aligned with the TT-related medical visits of the 72 hypogonadal men, all participants will be followed up with clinical assessments and bio sampling at weeks 0, 6, 15, 24, and 36. Expected results: Compared to Waitlist control groups, treatment groups are expected to be more effective and efficacious (depression score reduction of ≥50%) at week 24 and at the follow-up at week 36. The MSPP is expected to show higher effectiveness and efficacy for depressive symptoms and higher acceptability (lower dropout rate) as compared to CBT. Discussion: This study represents the first attempt to test a male-specific psychotherapy for MDD in a single-setting compared to standard CBT and a Waitlist control condition using randomized clinical trial methodology. In addition, the potential positive adjunct effect of psychotherapy to TT in reducing depressive burden and improving quality of life in hypogonadal depressed men represents a neglected research area and might introduce new hypogonadism screening procedures in depressed men and combined treatment approaches for depressed men suffering from hypogonadism. Limitations are the rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria, which limit the generalizability of the study results to first episode treatment naïve depressed men. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05435222.

Indexed as

hypogonadismmajor depressive disordermen’s mental healthpsychotherapypsychotherapy effectivenesspsychotherapy utilizationtestosterone treatmenttraditional masculinity ideologies

Identifiers

PMID37415687
PMCPMC10321526
OpenAlexW4381511092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.