ArticleHealth science reports2023
The effects of virtual reality-based bronchoscopy simulator on learning outcomes of medical trainees: A systematic review.
Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bridging traditional gaps in medical training with mixed reality: insights from bronchoscopy education-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Measuring students' perceptions of virtual reality for learning anatomy using the general extended technology acceptance model for E-learning.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Article
- Advancing education in interventional psychiatry: scoping review of simulation training and the future of virtual reality-based learning.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
- The Impact of Remote Visualized Teaching on Clinical Competence Following Short-Term Bronchoscopy Training.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Innovations to Improve Lung Isolation Training for Thoracic Anesthesia: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The effects of virtual reality-based bronchoscopy simulator on learning outcomes of medical trainees: A systematic review.Health science reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Conventional medical training routes of bronchoscopy may decrease patients' comfort and increase procedure-related morbidity. Virtual reality (VR)-based bronchoscopy is a beneficial and safe solution for teaching trainees. The aim of this systematic review was to study the effectiveness of VR-based bronchoscopy simulators on the learning outcomes of medical trainees. Methods: Well-known sources (i.e., Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Medline via PubMed) were systematically searched using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines on December, 2021. Peer-reviewed English papers that used VR-based simulation for bronchoscopy training were included. The articles that were studying other technologies, or those that were unrelated to the topic, were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists for quasi-experimental studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results: Out of 343 studies, 8 of them met our inclusion criteria. An appropriate control group and statistical analysis were the most common and unavoidable sources of bias in included non-RCTs, and lack of blinding in participants was the most common source of bias in RCTs. The included studies evaluated learning outcomes regarding dexterity ( Conclusion: VR bronchoscopy simulator as a training method for teaching medical trainees, especially for novices has the potential to improve medical trainees' performance and reduce complications. Further studies are needed to evaluate the positive effects of VR-based simulation on the learning outcomes of medical trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.