Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37415182›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2023

The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review.

Amber van den Akker, Alice Fabbri, Dima I Alardah, Anna B Gilmore, Harry Rutter

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 'It's about collaboration': a whole-systems approach to understanding and promoting movement in Suffolk.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mapping complex public health problems with causal loop diagrams.International journal of epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  20. A Systems Map of the Challenges of Climate Communication.Journal of health communication · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amber van den AkkerUniversity of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom. avda21@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-3418
Alice FabbriUniversity of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8413-0440
Dima I AlardahUniversity of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8094-9010
Anna B GilmoreUniversity of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0281-1248
Harry RutterUniversity of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9322-0656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextParticipatory systems mapping is increasingly used to gain insight into the complex systems surrounding non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors.

objectivesTo identify and synthesize studies that used participatory systems mapping in the context of non-communicable diseases.

designScoping review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that focused on NCDs and/or related risk factors, and included participants at any stage of their system's mapping process, were included. CATEGORIES FOR ANALYSIS: The main categories for analysis were: (1) problem definition and goal-setting, (2) participant involvement, (3) structure of the mapping process, (4) validation of the systems map, and (5) evaluation of the mapping process.

resultsWe identified 57 studies that used participatory systems mapping for a variety of purposes, including to inform or evaluate policies or interventions and to identify potential leverage points within a system. The number of participants ranged from 6 to 590. While policymakers and professionals were the stakeholder groups most often included, some studies described significant added value from including marginalized communities. There was a general lack of formal evaluation in most studies. However, reported benefits related mostly to individual and group learning, whereas limitations described included a lack of concrete actions following from systems mapping exercises.

conclusionsBased on the findings of this review, we argue that research using participatory systems mapping would benefit from considering three different but intertwined actions: explicitly considering how different participants and the power imbalances between them may influence the participatory process, considering how the results from a systems mapping exercise may effectively inform policy or translate into action, and including and reporting on evaluation and outcomes of the process, wherever possible.

Indexed as

Noncommunicable DiseasesExerciseHumansPolicyRisk FactorsNon-communicable diseasesParticipatory systems mappingReviewSystems thinkingUnhealthy commodities

Identifiers

PMID37415182
PMCPMC10327378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.