Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37415160›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2023

"You should brush your teeth better": a randomized controlled trial comparing best-possible versus as-usual toothbrushing.

Ulrike Weik, Sadhvi Shankar-Subramanian, Thorben Sämann, Bernd Wöstmann, Jutta Margraf-Stiksrud, Renate Deinzer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Exploring Toothbrushing Duration Among Adults: A Systematic Review.International journal of dental hygiene · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ulrike WeikInstitute of Medical Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, Giessen, D-35392, Germany. Ulrike.Weik@mp.jlug.de.
Sadhvi Shankar-SubramanianInstitute of Medical Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, Giessen, D-35392, Germany.
Thorben SämannInstitute of Medical Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, Giessen, D-35392, Germany.
Bernd WöstmannDental Clinic - Department of Prosthodontics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Jutta Margraf-StiksrudPhilipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Renate DeinzerInstitute of Medical Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, Giessen, D-35392, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost people's tooth brushing performance is deficient, even when they are encouraged to brush to the best of their abilities. The aim of the present study was to explore the nature of this deficit by comparing best-possible vs. as-usual brushing.

methodsUniversity students (N = 111) were randomly assigned to receive one of two instructions: "brush your teeth as usual" (AU-instruction) or "brush your teeth to the best of your abilities" (BP-instruction). Video analyses assessed brushing performance. The marginal plaque index (MPI) assessed after brushing was used as an indicator of brushing effectiveness. A questionnaire assessed subjectively perceived oral cleanliness (SPOC).

resultsParticipants in the BP group brushed their teeth longer (p = 0.008, d = 0.57) and used interdental devices more often (p < 0.001). No group differences emerged in the distribution of brushing time among surfaces, the percentage of brushing techniques used beyond horizontal scrubbing, or the appropriate use of interdental devices (all p > 0.16, all d < 0.30). Plaque persisted at the majority of the sections of the gingival margins, and the groups did not differ in this respect (p = 0.15; d = 0.22). SPOC values in the BP group were higher than those in the AU group (p = 0.006; d = 0.54). Both groups overestimated their actual oral cleanliness by approximately twofold.

conclusionsCompared to their usual brushing effort, study participants increased their effort when asked to brush their teeth in the best possible manner. However, that increase in effort was ineffective in terms of oral cleanliness. The results indicate that people's concept of optimized brushing refers to quantitative aspects (e.g., longer duration, more interdental hygiene) rather than qualitative aspects (e.g., considering inner surfaces and gingival margins, appropriate use of dental floss).

trial registrationThe study was registered in the appropriate national register ( www.drks.de ; ID: DRKS00017812; date of registration: 27/08/2019 - retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Dental PlaqueGingivitisToothDental Plaque IndexHumansToothbrushingDental health surveysDental plaqueHealth behaviorHealth educationOral hygienePeriodontal diseaseTooth brushing

Identifiers

PMID37415160
PMCPMC10327354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.