Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37415131›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2023

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Mainland Chinese version of the manchester orofacial pain disability scale (MOPDS) among college students.

Yao Feng, Ze-Yue Ou-Yang, Jing-Jie Lu, Yi-Fan Yang, Qian Zhang, Meng-Mei Zhong, Ning-Xin Chen, Xiao-Lin Su, Jing Hu, Qin Ye and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yao Feng *Department of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Ze-Yue Ou-Yang *Department of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Jing-Jie LuMedical Psychological Center, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Yi-Fan YangDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Qian ZhangDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Meng-Mei ZhongDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Ning-Xin ChenDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Xiao-Lin SuDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Jing HuDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Qin YeDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Jie ZhaoDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Ya-Qiong ZhaoDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Yun ChenDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Li TanDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Qiong LiuDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Yun-Zhi FengDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Yue GuoDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China. guoyue@csu.edu.cn.
Central South University · CNSecond Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrofacial pain (OFP) is a highly prevalent disorder in mainland China that predisposes to an associated physical and psychological disability. There is lack of a good properties mainland Chinese version of instrument to examine OFP. This study aims to cross-cultural adaptation and evaluate psychometrics properties of the Manchester Orofacial Pain Disability Scale (MOPDS) in mainland Chinese Mandarin context.

methodsTranslation and cross-cultural adaption of the mainland Chinese version MOPDS were conducted following accepted guidelines of self-report measures. Chinese college students (N = 1039) completed the mainland Chinese version of the MOPDS for item analysis, reliability and validity tests, and measurement invariance analysis, and after a one-month interval, around 10% of the sample (n = 110) were invited to retest. To conduct the CFA and measurement invariance analysis, Mplus 8.4 was used. IBM SPSS Statistics 26 software were used for all additional studies.

resultsWe found that the mainland Chinese version of MOPDS contains 25 items, divided into two categories: physical disability and psychological disability. The scale demonstrated excellent internal reliability, test-retest reliability, and validity. The measurement invariance results proved that the scale could be applied to people of different gender, age, and health consultation status.

conclusionsThe results demonstrated the mainland Chinese version of MOPDS has good psychometric properties and can be used to measure the level of physical and psychological disability of Chinese OFP peoples.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonFacial PainHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesAssessmentMeasurement invarianceOrofacial painPsychometric propertiesTest translation and adaptation

Identifiers

PMID37415131
PMCPMC10324202
OpenAlexW4383342689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.