Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37415125›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical imaging2023

Machine learning for predicting the risk stratification of 1-5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on CT.

Cui Zhang, Jian Wang, Yang Yang, Bailing Dai, Zhihua Xu, Fangmei Zhu, Huajun Yu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cui Zhang *Department of Radiology, TongDe Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No.234, Gucui Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jian Wang *Department of Radiology, TongDe Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No.234, Gucui Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yang YangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, No.287, Changhuai Road, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Bailing DaiDepartment of Radiology, TongDe Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No.234, Gucui Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhihua XuDepartment of Radiology, TongDe Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No.234, Gucui Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Fangmei ZhuDepartment of Radiology, TongDe Hospital of Zhejiang Province, No.234, Gucui Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Huajun YuDepartment of Radiology, Zhejiang Hospital, No. 12, Lingyin Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. yuhuajunde@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroudTo predict the malignancy of 1-5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) by machine learning (ML) on CT images using three models - Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT) and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT).

methods231 patients from Center 1 were randomly assigned into the training cohort (n = 161) and the internal validation cohort (n = 70) in a 7:3 ratio. The other 78 patients from Center 2 served as the external test cohort. Scikit-learn software was used to build three classifiers. The performance of the three models were evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the curve (AUC). Diagnostic differences between ML models and radiologists were compared in the external test cohort. Important features of LR and GBDT were analyzed and compared.

resultsGBDT outperformed LR and DT with the largest AUC values (0.981 and 0.815) in the training and internal validation cohorts and the greatest accuracy (0.923, 0.833 and 0.844) across all three cohorts. However, LR was found to have the largest AUC value (0.910) in the external test cohort. DT yielded the worst accuracy (0.790 and 0.727) and AUC values (0.803 and 0.700) in both the internal validation cohort and the external test cohort. GBDT and LR performed better than radiologists. Long diameter was demonstrated to be the same and most important CT feature for GBDT and LR.

conclusionsML classifiers, especially GBDT and LR with high accuracy and strong robustness, were considered to be promising in risk classification of 1-5 cm gastric GISTs based on CT. Long diameter was found the most important feature for risk stratification.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsStomach NeoplasmsHumansMachine LearningRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedGastrointestinal stromal tumorsMachine learningRisk assessmentX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID37415125
PMCPMC10327391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.