Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37415024›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2023

Lessons Learned from Telemonitoring in an Outpatient Bariatric Surgery Pathway-Secondary Outcomes of a Patient Preference Clinical Trial.

Elisabeth S van Ede, Jai Scheerhoorn, Friso M J F Schonck, Jonna A van der Stam, Marc P Buise, Simon W Nienhuijs, R Arthur Bouwman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04754893 (Postbariatric EArly Discharge Controlled by Healthdot), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04754893 nacompletednot on this map

Postbariatric EArly Discharge Controlled by Healthdot (PEACH)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilips Electronics Nederland B.V. acting through Philips CTO organizationRan2021 to 2021Enrolled208ConditionsBariatric Surgery CandidateArmsHealthdot application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth S van EdeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. lisavanede@hotmail.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-4392-7098
Jai ScheerhoornDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Friso M J F SchonckDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jonna A van der StamDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Marc P BuiseDepartment of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Simon W NienhuijsDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
R Arthur BouwmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote monitoring is increasingly used to support postoperative care. This study aimed to describe the lessons learned from the use of telemonitoring in an outpatient bariatric surgery pathway. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients were assigned based on their preference to an intervention cohort of same-day discharge after bariatric surgery. In total, 102 patients were monitored continuously for 7 days using a wearable monitoring device with a Continuous and Remote Early Warning Score-based notification protocol (CREWS). Outcome measures included missing data, course of postoperative heart and respiration rate, false positive notification and specificity analysis, and vital sign assessment during teleconsultation.

resultsIn 14.7% of the patients, data for heart rate was missing for > 8 h. A day-night-rhythm of heart rate and respiration rate reappeared on average on postoperative day 2 with heart rate amplitude increasing after day 3. CREWS notification had a specificity of 98%. Of the 17 notifications, 70% was false positive. Half of them occurred between day 4 and 7 and were accompanied with surrounding reassuring values. Comparable postoperative complaints were encountered between patients with normal and deviated data.

conclusionTelemonitoring after outpatient bariatric surgery is feasible. It supports clinical decisions, however does not replace nurse or physician care. Although infrequent, the false notification rate was high. We suggested additional contact may not be necessary when notifications occur after restoration of circadian rhythm or when surrounding reassuring vital signs are present. CREWS supports ruling out serious complications, what may reduce in-hospital re-evaluations. Following these lessons learned, increased patients' comfort and decreased clinical workload could be expected.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT04754893.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidHeart RateHumansOutpatientsPatient PreferenceClinical practiceContinuous and remote monitoringOutpatient bariatric surgeryTelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID37415024
PMCPMC10435410
OpenAlexW4383480822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.