Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37414949›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2023

Identifying species likely threatened by international trade on the IUCN Red List can inform CITES trade measures.

Daniel W S Challender, Patricia J Cremona, Kelly Malsch, Janine E Robinson, Alyson T Pavitt, Janet Scott, Rachel Hoffmann, Ackbar Joolia, Thomasina E E Oldfield, Richard K B Jenkins and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The entanglement between the IUCN Red List and international biodiversity law.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Species risk assessment informs trade regulation.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniel W S ChallenderInterdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science (ICCS), Department of Biology and Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. dan.challender@biology.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0606-1715
Patricia J CremonaIUCN Science & Data Centre: Biodiversity Assessment & Knowledge Team, The David Attenborough Building, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0662-3260
Kelly MalschUN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, UK.
Janine E RobinsonDurrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Alyson T PavittUN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, UK.
Janet ScottIUCN Science & Data Centre: Biodiversity Assessment & Knowledge Team, The David Attenborough Building, Cambridge, UK.
Rachel HoffmannSustainable Use and Livelihoods Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission/Commission on Environmental, Economic and Social Policy, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Gland, Switzerland.
Ackbar JooliaIUCN Science & Data Centre: Biodiversity Assessment & Knowledge Team, The David Attenborough Building, Cambridge, UK.
Thomasina E E OldfieldTRAFFIC, The David Attenborough Building, Cambridge, UK.
Richard K B JenkinsIUCN Science & Data Centre: Biodiversity Assessment & Knowledge Team, The David Attenborough Building, Cambridge, UK.
Dalia A CondeSpecies360 Conservation Science Alliance, Bloomington, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7923-8163
Craig Hilton-TaylorIUCN Science & Data Centre: Biodiversity Assessment & Knowledge Team, The David Attenborough Building, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1163-1425
Michael HoffmannConservation and Policy, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4785-2254
International Union for Conservation of Nature (United Kingdom) · GBUN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre · GBInternational Institute for Environment and Development · GBUniversity of Kent · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKZoological Society of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overexploitation is a major threat to biodiversity and international trade in many species is regulated through the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). However, there is no established method to systematically determine which species are most at risk from international trade to inform potential trade measures under CITES. Here, we develop a mechanism using the International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List of Threatened Species to identify species that are likely to be threatened by international trade. Of 2,211 such species, CITES includes 59% (1,307 species), leaving two-fifths overlooked and in potential need of international trade regulation. Our results can inform deliberations on potential proposals to revise trade measures for species at CITES Conference of the Parties meetings. We also show that, for taxa with biological resource use documented as a threat, the number of species threatened by local and national use is four times greater than species likely threatened by international trade. To effectively address the overexploitation of species, interventions focused on achieving sustainability in international trade need to be complemented by commensurate measures to ensure that local and national use and trade of wildlife is well-regulated and sustainable.

Indexed as

CommerceConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsAnimals, WildEndangered SpeciesInternationality

Identifiers

PMID37414949
PMCPMC10545538
OpenAlexW4383340927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.