Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37414941›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

The effects of endoscope placement in the hypopharynx on swallowing-related measures in healthy adults.

Rebecca H Affoo, Ciara Nellenbach, Joe Chomchai, Nicole Rogus-Pulia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca H AffooSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Sir Charles Tupper Medical Building, 5850 College St., Halifax, NS, B3M 1N8, Canada. rebecca.affoo@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5345-7205
Ciara NellenbachSCL Health, Platte Valley Medical Center, 1606 Prairie Center Pkwy, Suite 130, Brighton, CO, 80601, USA.
Joe ChomchaiUniversity of Michigan Health System, MyMichigan Physicians Group, Central Michigan University, 4851 E. Pickard Street, Suite 2700, Mt. Pleasant, MI, 48858, USA.
Nicole Rogus-PuliaDivision of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-School of Medicine and Public Health, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, 2500 Overlook Terrace, Madison GRECC (11G), Room D4240, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Central Michigan University · USDalhousie University · CAGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USPlatte Valley Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to determine whether transnasal passage of a flexible endoscope results in changes in salivary flow rate (SFR), spontaneous swallow frequency (SSF), and masticatory efficiency (ME) in healthy adults.

methodsData were collected from 15 healthy adults, 20-63 years of age. SFR and SSF were measured at baseline, after endoscope insertion, and after endoscope removal. The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids was administered at baseline and while the endoscope was in the hypopharynx. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine the effect of endoscope insertion on SFR and SSF. A paired samples t-test was used to determine the effect of endoscope insertion on total mastication time and number of masticatory cycles required with a cracker bolus. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.

resultsSFR was found to be significantly increased during endoscope placement in the hypopharynx (M = 0.471 g/min, SD = 0.175, p = 0.002) as well as following endoscope removal (M = 0.481 g/min, SD = 0.231, p = 0.004), as compared to baseline (M = 0.310 g/min, SD = 0.130). Total mastication time and number of masticatory cycles required with a cracker bolus were significantly decreased when the endoscope was present in the hypopharynx, as compared to baseline t(14) = 3.054, p = 0.009; t(14) = 3.250, p = 0.006, respectively.

conclusionsVisualization of swallowing during FEES is an important method for objectively evaluating several anatomical and functional parameters of the pharynx and larynx. Insertion of the endoscope into the hypopharynx during FEES may stimulate salivary secretion and improve ME, which could influence interpretation of FEES and resulting clinical recommendations.

Indexed as

DeglutitionDeglutition DisordersAdultEndoscopesHumansHypopharynxMasticationPharynxFEESMasticationSalivaSwallowing

Identifiers

PMID37414941
OpenAlexW4383481783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.