ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2023
Genetic inconsistency at the D6S1043 locus caused by microdeletion at 6q15.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the practice of parentage testing, short tandem repeat (STR) genetic inconsistencies occasionally occur and are usually treated as genetic mutations. However, they arise for various reasons. To elucidate the reasons for their occurrence, this study investigates a typical trio. For the D6S1043 locus, the genotype of the biological mother comprised the heterozygous alleles "7,20"; that of the child, allele 20; and that of the alleged father, a heterozygous allele "11,13," revealing a 7-step mutation. Different kits were first used to verify the data. The locus map, primers, and core sequences were then analyzed. Ultimately, the STR and single nucleotide polymorphisms of 6q were tested to determine the microdeletion range. The results revealed that this was indeed a true trio, and the underlying cause of the genetic inconsistency at this locus was a microdeletion of approximately 0.74-1.78 Mb in 6q15. Overall, genetic inconsistencies detected during practical work, and particularly rare multi-step mutations, cannot be directly identified as STR mutations. Different tools should be used to examine the causes of genetic inconsistencies from various perspectives and improve the effectiveness of genetic evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37414920What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.