Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37414808›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A novel investigation using thermal modeling and optimization of waste pyrolysis reactor using finite element analysis and response surface methodology.

Shivi Garg, Anand Nayyar, Abdulrajak Buradi, Krushna Prasad Shadangi, Prabhakar Sharma, Bhaskor Jyoti Bora, Akshay Jain, Mohd Asif Shah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Shivi GargEnergy Institute, Bengaluru, Centre of Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Petroleum Technology, Bangalore, Karnataka, 562157, India.
Anand NayyarGraduate School, Faculty of Information Technology, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Viet Nam. anandnayyar@duytan.edu.vn.
Abdulrajak BuradiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560064, India.
Krushna Prasad ShadangiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology, Burla, Sambalpur, Odisha, 768018, India.
Prabhakar SharmaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University, New Delhi, 110089, India.
Bhaskor Jyoti BoraEnergy Institute, Bengaluru, Centre of Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Petroleum Technology, Bangalore, Karnataka, 562157, India.
Akshay JainEnergy Institute, Bengaluru, Centre of Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Petroleum Technology, Bangalore, Karnataka, 562157, India.
Mohd Asif ShahDepartment of Economics, Bakhtar University, Kabul, 2496300, Afghanistan. ohaasif@bakhtar.edu.af.
Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Petroleum Technology · INBakhtar University · AFDelhi Skill and Entrepreneurship UniversityDuy Tan University · VNVeer Surendra Sai University of Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence of humans on the environment is growing drastically and is pervasive. If this trend continues for a longer time, it can cost humankind, social and economic challenges. Keeping this situation in mind, renewable energy has paved the way as our saviour. This shift will not only help in reducing pollution but will also provide immense opportunities for the youth to work. This work discusses about various waste management strategies and discusses the pyrolysis process in details. Simulations were done keeping pyrolysis as the base process and by varying parameters like feeds and reactor materials. Different feeds were chosen like Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE), wheat straw, pinewood, and a mixture of Polystyrene (PS), Polyethylene (PE), and Polypropylene (PP). Different reactor materials were considered namely, stainless steel AISI 202, AISI 302, AISI 304, and AISI 405. AISI stands for American Iron and Steel Institute. AISI is used to signify some standard grades of alloy steel bars. Thermal stress and thermal strain values and temperature contours were obtained using simulation software called Fusion 360. These values were plotted against temperature using graphing software called Origin. It was observed that these values increased with increasing temperature. LDPE got the lowest values for stress and stainless steel AISI 304 came out to be the most feasible material for pyrolysis reactor having the ability to withstand high thermal stresses. RSM was effectively used to generate a robust prognostic model with high efficiency, R

Identifiers

PMID37414808
PMCPMC10325990
OpenAlexW4383374883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.