Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37414784›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Decoding numeracy and literacy in the human brain: insights from MEG and MVPA.

Sanjeev Nara, Haider Raza, Manuel Carreiras, Nicola Molinaro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neural dynamics of social verb processing: an MEG study.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Revisiting the role of computational neuroimaging in the era of integrative neuroscience.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sanjeev NaraDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Physics, Geography, Mathematical Institute, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Germany. sanjeevnara01@gmail.com.
Haider RazaSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3955-0144
Manuel CarreirasBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Donostia/San Sebastian, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6726-7613
Nicola MolinaroBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Donostia/San Sebastian, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7549-6042
Ikerbasque · ESJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numbers and letters are the fundamental building blocks of our everyday social interactions. Previous studies have focused on determining the cortical pathways shaped by numeracy and literacy in the human brain, partially supporting the hypothesis of distinct perceptual neural circuits involved in the visual processing of the two categories. In this study, we aim to investigate the temporal dynamics for number and letter processing. We present magnetoencephalography (MEG) data from two experiments (N = 25 each). In the first experiment, single numbers, letters, and their respective false fonts (false numbers and false letters) were presented, whereas, in the second experiment, numbers, letters, and their respective false fonts were presented as a string of characters. We used multivariate pattern analysis techniques (time-resolved decoding and temporal generalization), testing the strong hypothesis that the neural correlates supporting letter and number processing can be logistically classified as categorically separate. Our results show a very early dissociation (~ 100 ms) between numbers, and letters when compared to false fonts. Number processing can be dissociated with similar accuracy when presented as isolated items or strings of characters, while letter processing shows dissociable classification accuracy for single items compared to strings. These findings reinforce the evidence indicating that early visual processing can be differently shaped by the experience with numbers and letters; this dissociation is stronger for strings compared to single items, thus showing that combinatorial mechanisms for numbers and letters could be categorically distinguished and influence early visual processing.

Indexed as

LiteracyMagnetoencephalographyBrainHumansPattern Recognition, VisualReadingVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID37414784
PMCPMC10326015
OpenAlexW4383377962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.