Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37414776›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

A spatio-temporal analysis investigating completeness and inequalities of global urban building data in OpenStreetMap.

Benjamin Herfort, Sven Lautenbach, João Porto de Albuquerque, Jennings Anderson, Alexander Zipf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The changing surface of the world's roads.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Urban greenspace and dementia: Measures, mechanisms, and methodological guidance.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Water outage predictions for natural hazards using synthetic water distribution systems.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin HerfortHeidelberg Institute for Geoinformation Technology, Heidelberg, Germany. benjamin.herfort@heigit.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9738-4060
Sven LautenbachHeidelberg Institute for Geoinformation Technology, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-9996
João Porto de AlbuquerqueUrban Big Data Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3160-3168
Jennings AndersonMeta Platforms Inc., Salem, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9816-5142
Alexander ZipfHeidelberg Institute for Geoinformation Technology, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-9838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OpenStreetMap (OSM) has evolved as a popular dataset for global urban analyses, such as assessing progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. However, many analyses do not account for the uneven spatial coverage of existing data. We employ a machine-learning model to infer the completeness of OSM building stock data for 13,189 urban agglomerations worldwide. For 1,848 urban centres (16% of the urban population), OSM building footprint data exceeds 80% completeness, but completeness remains lower than 20% for 9,163 cities (48% of the urban population). Although OSM data inequalities have recently receded, partially as a result of humanitarian mapping efforts, a complex unequal pattern of spatial biases remains, which vary across various human development index groups, population sizes and geographic regions. Based on these results, we provide recommendations for data producers and urban analysts to manage the uneven coverage of OSM data, as well as a framework to support the assessment of completeness biases.

Identifiers

PMID37414776
PMCPMC10326063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.