ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2023
WindowSHAP: An efficient framework for explaining time-series classifiers based on Shapley values.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Explainable Quality-Aware ECG-PCG Fusion for Cardiovascular Disease Detection Using Robust Feature Modeling.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable time-series forecasting with sampling-free SHAP for Transformers.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Explainable deep learning for healthcare workforce attrition: a methodological study on the Watson healthcare synthetic benchmark.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Explainability in action: A metric-driven assessment of local explanations for healthcare tabular models.PloS one · 2026Article
- Interpretable manifold learning for T-wave alternans assessment with electrocardiographic imaging.Engineering applications of artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Finding the needle in the haystack-An interpretable sequential pattern mining method for classification problems.Frontiers in big data · 2025Article
- Practical guide to SHAP analysis: Explaining supervised machine learning model predictions in drug development.Clinical and translational science · 2024Review
- Surveying haemoperfusion impact on COVID-19 from machine learning using Shapley values.Inflammopharmacology · 2024Article
- An explainable long short-term memory network for surgical site infection identification.Surgery · 2024Article
- From injury to comeback: A systematic review of machine learning models predicting return to sport in athletes.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unpacking and comprehending how black-box machine learning algorithms (such as deep learning models) make decisions has been a persistent challenge for researchers and end-users. Explaining time-series predictive models is useful for clinical applications with high stakes to understand the behavior of prediction models, e.g., to determine how different variables and time points influence the clinical outcome. However, existing approaches to explain such models are frequently unique to architectures and data where the features do not have a time-varying component. In this paper, we introduce WindowSHAP, a model-agnostic framework for explaining time-series classifiers using Shapley values. We intend for WindowSHAP to mitigate the computational complexity of calculating Shapley values for long time-series data as well as improve the quality of explanations. WindowSHAP is based on partitioning a sequence into time windows. Under this framework, we present three distinct algorithms of Stationary, Sliding and Dynamic WindowSHAP, each evaluated against baseline approaches, KernelSHAP and TimeSHAP, using perturbation and sequence analyses metrics. We applied our framework to clinical time-series data from both a specialized clinical domain (Traumatic Brain Injury - TBI) as well as a broad clinical domain (critical care medicine). The experimental results demonstrate that, based on the two quantitative metrics, our framework is superior at explaining clinical time-series classifiers, while also reducing the complexity of computations. We show that for time-series data with 120 time steps (hours), merging 10 adjacent time points can reduce the CPU time of WindowSHAP by 80 % compared to KernelSHAP. We also show that our Dynamic WindowSHAP algorithm focuses more on the most important time steps and provides more understandable explanations. As a result, WindowSHAP not only accelerates the calculation of Shapley values for time-series data, but also delivers more understandable explanations with higher quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.