Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37410975›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2023

Tumor Mutational Burden in Real-World Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: Genomic Alterations and Predictive Value for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Effectiveness.

Julia C F Quintanilha, Michael H Storandt, Ryon P Graf, Gerald Li, Rachel Keller, Douglas I Lin, Jeffrey S Ross, Richard S P Huang, Alexa B Schrock, Geoffrey R Oxnard and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Personalizing DNA Cancer Vaccines.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Julia C F QuintanilhaFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.
Michael H StorandtMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Ryon P GrafFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-8065-4148
Gerald LiFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-5617-6262
Rachel KellerFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-6138-9257
Douglas I LinFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-0105-9760
Jeffrey S RossFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-8494-2596
Richard S P HuangFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-8395-5168
Alexa B SchrockFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-0106-9096
Geoffrey R OxnardFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-1054-8240
Sakti ChakrabartiUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-1582-098X
Amit MahipalUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-1111-8333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is largely considered a nonimmunogenic malignancy; however, approximately 1%, of patients may have tumors with deficient mismatch repair, high microsatellite instability, or high tumor mutational burden (TMB ≥10 mutations/Mb), which may be predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. We sought to analyze outcomes of patients with high-TMB and pathogenic genomic alterations observed in this population.

methodsThis study included patients with PDAC who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) at Foundation Medicine (Cambridge, MA). Clinical data were obtained from a US-wide real-world clinicogenomic pancreatic database. We report genomic alterations in those with high and low TMB, and compare outcomes on the basis of receipt of single-agent ICI or therapy regimens not containing ICI.

resultsWe evaluated 21,932 patients with PDAC who had tissue CGP data available, including 21,639 (98.7%) with low-TMB and 293 (1.3%) with high-TMB. Among patients with high-TMB, a greater number of alterations were observed in

conclusionLonger survival was observed in patients with high-TMB receiving ICI compared with those with low-TMB. This supports the role of high-TMB as a predictive biomarker for efficacy of ICI therapy in PDAC. Additionally, we report higher rates of

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorGenomicsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Biomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID37410975
PMCPMC10581638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.