Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37410728›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2023

EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks.

Michael Caiola, Avaneesh Babu, Meijun Ye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael CaiolaDivision of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-7963
Avaneesh BabuDivision of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Meijun YeDivision of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Center for Devices and Radiological Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke are devastating neurological conditions that affect hundreds of people daily. Unfortunately, detecting TBI and stroke without specific imaging techniques or access to a hospital often proves difficult. Our prior research used machine learning on electroencephalograms (EEGs) to select important features and to classify between normal, TBI, and stroke on an independent dataset from a public repository with an accuracy of 0.71. In this study, we expanded to explore whether featureless and deep learning models can provide better performance in distinguishing between TBI, stroke and normal EEGs by including more comprehensive data extraction tools to drastically increase the size of the training dataset. We compared the performance of models built upon selected features with Linear Discriminative Analysis and ReliefF with several featureless deep learning models. We achieved 0.85 area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) using feature-based models, and 0.84 AUC with featureless models. In addition, we demonstrated that Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) can provide insight into patient-specific EEG classification by highlighting problematic EEG segments during clinical review. Overall, our study suggests that machine learning and deep learning of EEG or its precomputed features can be a useful tool for TBI and stroke detection and classification. Although not surpassing the performance of feature-based models, featureless models reached similar levels without prior computation of a large feature set allowing for faster and cost-efficient deployment, analysis, and classification.

Identifiers

PMID37410728
PMCPMC10325050
OpenAlexW4383337779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.