Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37410723›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Evaluation of an organisational-level monetary incentive to promote the health and wellbeing of workers in small and medium-sized enterprises: A mixed-methods cluster randomised controlled trial.

Lena Al-Khudairy, Yasmin Akram, Samuel I Watson, Laura Kudrna, Joanna Hofman, Madeline Nightingale, Lailah Alidu, Andrew Rudge, Clare Rawdin, Iman Ghosh and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lena Al-KhudairyWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0638-583X
Yasmin AkramWest Midlands Combined Authority, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Samuel I WatsonInstitue Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.
Laura KudrnaInstitue Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8163-7112
Joanna HofmanRAND Europe, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Madeline NightingaleRAND Europe, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Lailah AliduKingston University, Surray, United Kingdom.
Andrew RudgeWest Midlands Combined Authority, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Clare RawdinWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Iman GhoshWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Frances MasonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Chinthana PereraWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Jane WrightWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Joseph BoachieWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Karla HemmingWest Midlands Combined Authority, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Ivo VlaevWarwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Sean RussellWest Midlands Combined Authority, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Richard J LilfordInstitue Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0634-984X
University of Warwick · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBRAND Europe · GBKingston University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted an independent evaluation on the effectiveness of an organisational-level monetary incentive to encourage small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to improve employees' health and wellbeing. This was A mixed-methods cluster randomised trial with four arms: high monetary incentive, low monetary incentive, and two no monetary incentive controls (with or without baseline measurements to examine 'reactivity' The consequence of particpant awareness of being studied, and potential impact on participant behavior effects). SMEs with 10-250 staff based in West Midlands, England were eligible. We randomly selected up to 15 employees at baseline and 11 months post-intervention. We elicited employee perceptions of employers' actions to improve health and wellbeing; and employees' self-reported health behaviours and wellbeing. We also interviewed employers and obtained qualitative data. One hundred and fifty-two SMEs were recruited. Baseline assessments were conducted in 85 SMEs in three arms, and endline assessments in 100 SMEs across all four arms. The percentage of employees perceiving "positive action" by their employer increased after intervention (5 percentage points, pp [95% Credible Interval -3, 21] and 3pp [-9, 17], in models for high and low incentive groups). Across six secondary questions about specific issues the results were strongly and consistently positive, especially for the high incentive. This was consistent with qualitative data and quantitative employer interviews. However, there was no evidence of any impact on employee health behaviour or wellbeing outcomes, nor evidence of 'reactivity'. An organisational intervention (a monetary incentive) changed employee perceptions of employer behaviour but did not translate into changes in employees' self-reports of their own health behaviours or wellbeing. Trial registration: AEARCTR-0003420, registration date: 17.10.2018, retrospectively registered (delays in contracts and identfying a suitable trial registry). The authors confirm that there are no ongoing and related trials for this intervention.

Identifiers

PMID37410723
PMCPMC10325111
OpenAlexW4383340131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.