Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37410715›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Motives and attitudes of parents toward HPV vaccination: Results from the initial period of HPV vaccine rollout in Serbia.

Mirjana Štrbac, Vladimir Vuković, Tatjana Pustahija, Nataša Nikolić, Smiljana Rajčević, Svetlana Ilić, Tihomir Dugandžija, Aleksandra Patić, Mioljub Ristić, Vladimir Petrović

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mirjana ŠtrbacInstitute of Public Health of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-1532-5548
Vladimir VukovićInstitute of Public Health of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Tatjana PustahijaInstitute of Public Health of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Nataša NikolićInstitute of Public Health of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Smiljana RajčevićInstitute of Public Health of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Svetlana IlićInstitute of Public Health of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Tihomir DugandžijaFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-6279-0413
Aleksandra PatićInstitute of Public Health of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-7068-2882
Mioljub RistićInstitute of Public Health of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-6923-189X
Vladimir PetrovićInstitute of Public Health of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.
University of Novi Sad · RSInstitute of Public Health of Vojvodina · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is one of the most common viral infections in sexually active population worldwide, and is the main cause of cervical cancer, which is the fourth most common cancer among women. Serbia ranks third in incidence and mortality rate of cervical cancer in Europe. We conducted a cross-sectional study considering parents' motivation for the HPV vaccination of their children. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and a logistic regression model. We found that the strongest motive was "Recommendation from paediatrician" (20.2%), followed by the attitude that HPV vaccine protects against cancers in different localization (15.4%), the motive "It is better to vaccinate a child than expose them to potential risk of HPV infection" (13.3%) and "Feeling anxiety due to a possible infection and cancer in the child" (13.1%). For those parents that vaccinated their child for some other strongest motive, reasons like "Vaccine is free of charge", "Recommendation from friends and family" and motive "My child received all obligatory vaccines, so I want to receive this one as well", were significantly more frequently selected. In the group where paediatricians' recommendation was not a motive for accepting the HPV vaccine, the largest percentage of parents (89.6%) selected motive "HPV vaccine protects against cancers in different localization" and the motive "It is better to vaccinate a child than expose them to potential risk of HPV infection" (78.1%). Paediatrician's recommendation is very important for parents' decision to vaccinate, however, other motives also influenced and had significance in making the parents' decision to vaccinate their children against HPV. Encouraging trust in public health authorities in Serbia, highlighting the advantages of the HPV vaccine and further encouraging healthcare workers to give stronger recommendations can increase the HPV vaccine uptake. Finally, we provided the basis to create more targeted messages that will empower parents to vaccinate their children.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAttitudeChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMotivationParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSerbiaSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID37410715
PMCPMC10325070
OpenAlexW4383337717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.