Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37410699›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2023

Value of a catch-up HPV test in women aged 65 and above: A Danish population-based nonrandomized intervention study.

Mette Tranberg, Lone Kjeld Petersen, Anne Hammer, Miriam Elfström, Jan Blaakær, Susanne Fogh Jørgensen, Mary Holten Bennetsen, Jørgen Skov Jensen, Berit Andersen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04114968 (Reducing the Burden of Cervical Cancer Among Older Women by Expanding the Screening Age and Offering HPV Self-sampling), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04114968 unknown statusnot on this map

Reducing the Burden of Cervical Cancer Among Older Women by Expanding the Screening Age and Offering HPV Self-sampling

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2019 to 2025Enrolled20,000ConditionsUterine Cervical Neoplasm, Uterine Neoplasm, Uterine Cervical Disease, Mass ScreeningArmsGP-based screening or HPV self-sampling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cervical cancer screening strategies in women 65 years and older in the human papillomavirus era: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human papillomavirus-based testing and self-sampling approaches.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The Use of First-Void Urine to Screen Women Aged 60-79 for HPV in the UK: The Catch-Up Screen Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mette TranbergUniversity Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6285-6694
Lone Kjeld PetersenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Anne HammerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4616-9827
Miriam ElfströmCenter for Cervical Cancer Prevention, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan BlaakærDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3726-0589
Susanne Fogh JørgensenUniversity Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4534-0351
Mary Holten BennetsenDepartment of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Jørgen Skov JensenResearch Unit for Reproductive Microbiology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Berit AndersenUniversity Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4074-6504
Regional Hospital Randers · DKAarhus University · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKKarolinska University Hospital · SEStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) test is replacing cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test due to superior sensitivity, but in most countries women ≥65 years have never had an HPV test despite they account for around 50% of cervical cancer deaths. We explored the effect of a catch-up HPV test among 65- to 69-year-old women without previous record of HPV-based screening. METHODS AND

findingsThis population-based nonrandomized intervention study (quasi-experimental design) included Danish women aged 65 to 69 with no record of cervical cancer screening in the last ≥5.5 years and no HPV-exit test at age 60 to 64 at the time of study inclusion. Eligible women residing in the Central Denmark Region were invited for HPV screening either by attending clinician-based sampling or requesting a vaginal self-sampling kit (intervention group, n = 11,192). Women residing in the remaining four Danish regions received standard care which was the opportunity to have a cervical cytology collected for whatever reason (reference group, n = 33,387). Main outcome measures were detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) per 1,000 women eligible for the screening offer and the benefit-harm ratio of the intervention and standard practice measured as the number of colposcopies needed to detect one CIN2+ case. The minimum follow-up time was 13 months for all tested women (range: 13 to 25 months). In the intervention group, 6,965 (62.2%) were screened within 12 months from the date of study inclusion and 743 (2.2%) women had a cervical cytology collected in the reference group. The CIN2+ detection was significantly higher in the intervention group (3.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): [2.9, 5.3]; p < 0.001; n = 44/11,192) as compared to the reference group (0.3, 95% CI: [0.2, 0.6]; n = 11/33,387). For the benefit-harm ratio, 11.6 (95% CI: [8.5, 15.8]; p = 0.69; n = 511/44) colposcopies were performed to detect one CIN2+ in the intervention group as compared to 10.1 (95% CI: [5.4, 18.8]; n = 111/11) colposcopies in the reference group. The study design entails a risk of confounding due to the lack of randomization.

conclusionsThe higher CIN2+ detection per 1,000 eligible women in the intervention group supports that a catch-up HPV test could potentially improve cervical cancer prevention in older women. This study informs the current scientific debate as to whether women aged 65 and above should be offered a catch-up HPV test if they never had an HPV test.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04114968.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAgedDenmarkEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaeVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID37410699
PMCPMC10325045
OpenAlexW4383340573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.