Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37410539›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2023

A Mental Health and Well-Being Chatbot: User Event Log Analysis.

Frederick Booth, Courtney Potts, Raymond Bond, Maurice Mulvenna, Catrine Kostenius, Indika Dhanapala, Alex Vakaloudis, Brian Cahill, Lauri Kuosmanen, Edel Ennis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Frederick BoothDepartment of Accounting, Finance & Economics, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6492-3953
Courtney PottsSchool of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5621-1611
Raymond BondSchool of Computing, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1078-2232
Maurice MulvennaSchool of Computing, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1554-0785
Catrine KosteniusDepartment of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3876-7202
Indika DhanapalaNimbus Research Centre, Munster Technological University, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4091-4870
Alex VakaloudisNimbus Research Centre, Munster Technological University, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9700-2595
Brian CahillNimbus Research Centre, Munster Technological University, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0930-7466
Lauri KuosmanenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1289-2611
Edel EnnisSchool of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9677-0725
University of Ulster · GBMunster Technological University · IELuleå University of Technology · SEUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConversational user interfaces, or chatbots, are becoming more popular in the realm of digital health and well-being. While many studies focus on measuring the cause or effect of a digital intervention on people's health and well-being (outcomes), there is a need to understand how users really engage and use a digital intervention in the real world.

objectiveIn this study, we examine the user logs of a mental well-being chatbot called ChatPal, which is based on the concept of positive psychology. The aim of this research is to analyze the log data from the chatbot to provide insight into usage patterns, the different types of users using clustering, and associations between the usage of the app's features.

methodsLog data from ChatPal was analyzed to explore usage. A number of user characteristics including user tenure, unique days, mood logs recorded, conversations accessed, and total number of interactions were used with k-means clustering to identify user archetypes. Association rule mining was used to explore links between conversations.

resultsChatPal log data revealed 579 individuals older than 18 years used the app with most users being female (n=387, 67%). User interactions peaked around breakfast, lunchtime, and early evening. Clustering revealed 3 groups including "abandoning users" (n=473), "sporadic users" (n=93), and "frequent transient users" (n=13). Each cluster had distinct usage characteristics, and the features were significantly different (P<.001) across each group. While all conversations within the chatbot were accessed at least once by users, the "treat yourself like a friend" conversation was the most popular, which was accessed by 29% (n=168) of users. However, only 11.7% (n=68) of users repeated this exercise more than once. Analysis of transitions between conversations revealed strong links between "treat yourself like a friend," "soothing touch," and "thoughts diary" among others. Association rule mining confirmed these 3 conversations as having the strongest linkages and suggested other associations between the co-use of chatbot features.

conclusionsThis study has provided insight into the types of people using the ChatPal chatbot, patterns of use, and associations between the usage of the app's features, which can be used to further develop the app by considering the features most accessed by users.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMobile ApplicationsAffectCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMalePsychological Well-Beingconversational agentconversational user interfacedata analysisdigital health applicationdigital interventionecological momentary assessmentevent log analysishealth caremental well-beingmobile health apppositive psychologyuser behavioruser datauser interface

Identifiers

PMID37410539
PMCPMC10360018
OpenAlexW4317765709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.