Bias and constructive processes in a self-memory system.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Trauma symptoms, memory accuracy, and eyewitness suggestibility: a mediation analysis in a non-clinical sample.BMC psychology · 2026
   Article
2. Memory and future thinking for self-conscious emotions: The role of self-esteem and culture.Memory & cognition · 2026
   Article
3. Maintaining and regaining episodic memory in Alzheimer disease: a circuit-based perspective.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026
   Review
4. Self-serving biases shape the relationship between future thinking and remembering of elections.Communications psychology · 2026
   Article
5. The memory systems of the human brain and generative artificial intelligence.Heliyon · 2024
   Review
6. Grandiose narcissism influences the phenomenology of remembered past and imagined future events.Memory (Hove, England)
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as