Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37410317›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2023

Bone Trans-omics: Integrating Omics to Unveil Mechanistic Molecular Networks Regulating Bone Biology and Disease.

Benjamin H Mullin, Amy B P Ribet, Nathan J Pavlos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Artificial intelligence virtual bone organoids (AIVBOs).Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Advances in Spatial Transcriptomics in Bone.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Lactylation-related geneFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin H Mullin *Bone Biology & Disease Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 2nd Floor "M" Block QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0743-770X
Amy B P Ribet *Bone Biology & Disease Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 2nd Floor "M" Block QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1168-6813
Nathan J PavlosBone Biology & Disease Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 2nd Floor "M" Block QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia. nathan.pavlos@uwa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7003-188X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRecent advancements in "omics" technologies and bioinformatics have afforded researchers new tools to study bone biology in an unbiased and holistic way. The purpose of this review is to highlight recent studies integrating multi-omics data gathered from multiple molecular layers (i.e.; trans-omics) to reveal new molecular mechanisms that regulate bone biology and underpin skeletal diseases. RECENT

findingsBone biologists have traditionally relied on single-omics technologies (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) to profile measureable differences (both qualitative and quantitative) of individual molecular layers for biological discovery and to investigate mechanisms of disease. Recently, literature has grown on the implementation of integrative multi-omics to study bone biology, which combines computational and informatics support to connect multiple layers of data derived from individual "omic" platforms. This emerging discipline termed "trans-omics" has enabled bone biologists to identify and construct detailed molecular networks, unveiling new pathways and unexpected interactions that have advanced our mechanistic understanding of bone biology and disease. While the era of trans-omics is poised to revolutionize our capacity to answer more complex and diverse questions pertinent to bone pathobiology, it also brings new challenges that are inherent when trying to connect "Big Data" sets. A concerted effort between bone biologists and interdisciplinary scientists will undoubtedly be needed to extract physiologically and clinically meaningful data from bone trans-omics in order to advance its implementation in the field.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomicsGene Expression ProfilingHumansMetabolomicsProteomicsBoneBone biologyMulti-omicsOsteoblastOsteoclastTrans-omics

Identifiers

PMID37410317
PMCPMC10543827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.