Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37410311›Full record

ArticleMarine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)2023

First Genomic Prediction of Single-Step Models in Large Yellow Croaker.

Jiaying Wang, Yulin Bai, Xiaoqing Zou, Chengyu Li, Junyi Yang, QiaoZhen Ke, Ji Zhao, Tao Zhou, Peng Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetic Parameter Estimation of Body Weight andAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jiaying WangState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yulin BaiState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Xiaoqing ZouState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Chengyu LiState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Junyi YangState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
QiaoZhen KeState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Ji ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Tao ZhouState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Peng XuState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Breeding, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China. xupeng77@xmu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFD2401002the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) U21A20264the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars 32225049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome selection is mainly used in disease-resistant traits of aquatic species; however, its implementation is hindered by a high cost of genotype and phenotype data collection. Single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (SSGBLUP) can integrate phenotypes, genetic markers, and pedigree records into simultaneous prediction without increasing genotyping costs. The objective of this study is to investigate the performance of SSGBLUP in large yellow croaker and to evaluate the effects of the number of phenotypic records and genotyping per family on the predictive ability of SSGBLUP. A large yellow croaker population consists of 6898 individuals from 14 families with survival time resistant against Cryptocaryon irritans (C. irritans), body weight (BW), and body length (BL) traits were collected, of which 669 individuals were genotyped. Results showed that the mean predictive ability of all traits in the individuals randomly sampling for SSGBLUP, GBLUP, and BLUP was 0.738, 0.738, and 0.736, respectively. Moreover, the predictive ability of SSGBLUP and BLUP models did not increase with the extra phenotypic records per family, in which the predictive ability of SSGBLUP and BLUP in survival time was 0.853 and 0.851 for only genotyped data (N = 0) used, and 0.852, 0.845 for all phenotypic records (N = 600) used, respectively. However, with the increase in the genotype number of training set, the prediction ability of SSGBLUP and GBLUP model was increased and the highest predictive ability was gained when the genotype number per family was 40 or 45. In addition, the prediction ability of SSGBLUP model was higher than that of GBLUP. Our study showed that the SSGBLUP model still has great potential and advantages in genomic breeding of large yellow croakers. It is recommended that each family provide 100 phenotypic individuals, of which 40 individuals with genotyping data for SSGBLUP model prediction and family resistance evaluation.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPerciformesAnimalsGenomeGenomicsGenotypePedigreePhenotypeCryptocaryon irritansGenomic selectionLarge yellow croakerSSGBLUP

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.