Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37410230›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Reconstructing Phylogenetic Relationship in Bladder Cancer: A Methodological Overview.

Lancelot Seillier, Martin Peifer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 68% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lancelot SeillierUniversity Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. lseillier@ukaachen.de.
Martin PeiferDepartment of Translational Genomics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer (BC) expresses itself as a highly heterogeneous disease both at the histological and molecular level, often occurring as synchronous or metachronous multifocal disease with high risk of recurrence and potential to metastasize. Multiple sequencing studies focusing on both non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) gave insights into the extent of both inter- and intrapatient heterogeneity, but many questions on clonal evolution in BC remain unanswered. In this review article, we provide an overview over the technical and theoretical concepts linked to reconstructing evolutionary trajectories in BC and propose a set of tools and established software for phylogenetic analysis.

Indexed as

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessPhylogenyCancer cell fractionClonal evolutionCopy number analysisData processingGenomicsPhylogeneticsVariant allele frequency

Identifiers

PMID37410230
OpenAlexW4383303095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.