Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37410176›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2023

A global perspective of forensic entomology case reports from 1935 to 2022.

Gengwang Hu, Liangliang Li, Yingna Zhang, Shipeng Shao, Yundi Gao, Ruonan Zhang, Yinghui Wang, Yanan Zhang, Yi Guo, Chengtao Kang and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. HOFE: an interactive forensic entomological database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gengwang HuDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Soochow University, Ganjiang East Road, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Liangliang LiDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Soochow University, Ganjiang East Road, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Yingna ZhangDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Soochow University, Ganjiang East Road, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Shipeng ShaoDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Soochow University, Ganjiang East Road, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Yundi GaoDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Soochow University, Ganjiang East Road, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Ruonan ZhangDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Soochow University, Ganjiang East Road, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Yinghui WangDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Soochow University, Ganjiang East Road, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Yanan ZhangDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Soochow University, Ganjiang East Road, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Yi GuoDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Soochow University, Ganjiang East Road, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Chengtao KangDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Soochow University, Ganjiang East Road, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Jiangfeng WangDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Soochow University, Ganjiang East Road, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Yu WangDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Soochow University, Ganjiang East Road, Suzhou, 215000, China. yuw@suda.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7097-6525

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31872258National Natural Science Foundation of China 32070508National Natural Science Foundation of China 32270545National Natural Science Foundation of China 82002007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic entomology case reports are the product of rapid development in the field, the widespread acceptance of the science and the application of forensic entomological knowledge. In this study, we retrospectively summarized information derived from 307 forensic entomology case reports from 1935 to 2022 from a global perspective. Our checklist of relevant information included insect species, specific indoor or outdoor preferences, preferred temperatures, and stages of body decomposition. Finally, a concept and calculation method for postmortem interval (PMI) estimation accuracy was proposed. There were 232 cases using insect developmental data and 28 cases using succession patterns to estimate PMI. A total of 146 species of insects were involved in the cases, of which 62.3% were Diptera and 37.7% were Coleoptera. Postmortem intervals were estimated from eggs in 4 cases, larvae in 180 cases, pupae in 45 cases, and puparia in 38 cases. The majority of cases were from June to October, and the average number of species mentioned in the cases was more at 15-30 °C. Considering the standardization of application, in the majority of cases, insect evidence was collected by other personnel and sent to forensic entomologists, there was a delay in the sampling, and the scene or meteorological data were directly used without correcting. Our data shows that there are still many shortcomings in the universality and standardization of forensic entomology in its practical application.

Indexed as

Forensic EntomologyInsectaPostmortem ChangesAnimalsColeopteraEntomologyHumansLarvaPupaRetrospective StudiesSeasonsTemperatureCase reportsDecomposition stageForensic anthropologyNecrophagous insectsPMI estimation accuracy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.