ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[First-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma].
Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma was revolutionized by the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). Within a few years several combined modality treatments with CPI and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have proven to be effective and safe in the application. According to the guidelines, up to five different combined modality treatments can now be considered, depending on the risk profile. Based on the current data situation, a direct distinction between the treatments cannot be made as no comparative studies are available. Therefore, the decision for a particular treatment is often guided by individual factors. In particular, a clear processing of the patient with the respective risk factors and tumor identity is essential. Hence, it is all the more important to discuss complex cases in an interdisciplinary tumor board.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37410165What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.