Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37410132›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2023

The New Zealand National Trauma Registry: an essential tool for trauma quality improvement.

Ian Civil, Siobhan Isles, Alaina Campbell, James Moore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Trauma registries: towards global standardisation and outcome evaluation.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ian CivilDepartment of Surgery, University of Auckland and National Trauma Network, Wellington, New Zealand. Ian.Civil@majortrauma.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1371-1114
Siobhan IslesNational Trauma Network, Wellington, New Zealand.
Alaina CampbellWaikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand.
James MooreIntensive Care Unit and Department of Anaesthesia, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTrauma registries are essential tools for trauma systems and underpin any quality improvement activities. This paper describes the history, function, challenges, and future goals of the New Zealand National Trauma Registry (NZTR).

methodsUsing the available publications and knowledge of the authors, the development, governance, oversight, and usage of the registry is outlined.

resultsThe New Zealand Trauma Network has run a national trauma registry since 2015 and this now contains over fifteen thousand major trauma patient records. Annual reports and a range of research outputs have been published. Key quality improvement initiatives have been undertaken and are described. Vulnerabilities include lack of longterm funding and a small workforce.

conclusionsThe NZTR has proven to be a critical component of trauma quality improvement in New Zealand. A user-friendly portal and a simple minimum dataset have been keys to successes but maintenance of an effective structure in a constrained healthcare system is a challenge.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementTrauma CentersHumansMedical RecordsNew ZealandRegistriesOutcomesQuality improvementRegistryTrauma

Identifiers

PMID37410132
PMCPMC10449937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.