Functional MRI but not white matter fibre dissection identifies language dominance.

objectivesLateralisation of some language pathways has been reported in the literature using diffusion tractography, which is more feasible than functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in challenging patients. Our retrospective study investigates whether a correlation exists between threshold-independent fMRI language lateralisation and structural lateralisation using tractography in healthy controls and brain tumour patients.

methodsFifteen healthy subjects and 61 patients underwent language fMRI and diffusion-weighted MRI. A regional fMRI laterality index (LI) was calculated. Tracts dissected were the arcuate fasciculus (long direct and short indirect tracts), uncinate fasciculus, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus and frontal aslant tract. An asymmetry index (AI) for each tract was calculated using tract volume analysed with single tensor (ST) and spherical deconvolution (SD) models, as well as hindrance modulated orientational anisotropy (HMOA) for SD tracts. Linear regression assessed the correlation between LI and AI.

resultsIn all subjects, there was no significant correlation between LI and AI for any of the dissected tracts. Significant correlations were only found when handedness for controls and tumour volume for patients were included as covariates. In handedness subgroups, the average AI of some tracts showed the same laterality as LI, and some the opposite. Discordant results were observed for ST- and SD-based AIs.

conclusionsOur results do not support using tractography in the assessment of language lateralisation. The discordant results between ST and SD indicate that either the structural lateralisation of dissected tracts is less robust than functional lateralisation, or tractography is not sensitive methodology. Other diffusion analysis approaches should be developed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Although diffusion tractography may be more feasible than fMRI in challenging tumour patients and where sedation or anaesthesia is required, our results do not currently recommend replacing fMRI with tractography using volume or HMOA in the assessment of language lateralisation. KEY POINTS: • No correlation found between fMRI and tractography in language lateralisation. • Discordance between asymmetry indices of different tractography models and metrics. • Tractography not currently recommended in language lateralisation assessment.