Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37410103›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Application of a protocol for enhanced recovery after radical cystectomy: a before-and-after cohort study.

Claudia Brusasco, Antonia Di Domenico, Marco Ennas, Andrea Benelli, Federico Dotta, Mattia Tosi, Martina Manfredi, Tiziana Calcagno, Fabio Campodonico, Federico Germinale and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia BrusascoAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura della Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy. claudia.brusasco@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6709-6172
Antonia Di DomenicoUrology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.
Marco EnnasUrology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea BenelliUrology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.
Federico DottaUrology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.
Mattia TosiUrology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.
Martina ManfrediUrology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.
Tiziana CalcagnoUrology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.
Fabio CampodonicoUrology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.
Federico GerminaleUrology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea MontevecchiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Giovanni Borea Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
Francesco CorradiDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Carlo IntroiniUrology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.
Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadical cystectomy with urinary diversion is a major urological surgery burdened both by a high rate of short- and long-term complications and by a high emotional and psychological impact. Post-operative recovery is extremely important and the application of ERAS protocols can facilitate the return to functional autonomy. The aim of the present study was to verify the efficacy of our ERAS programme on outcomes of recovery after surgery of patients undergoing radical cystectomy with various urinary diversions.

methodsThis is a before-after study comparing the historical group (n. 77) of radical cystectomies following a peri-operative standard of care with the prospective observational group (n. 83) following our ERAS programme. Recovery after surgery outcomes evaluated were length of stay, re-admission rate at 30-90/days and post-operative complications.

resultsPatients treated following the ERAS protocol presented less intra-operative blood loss (p < 0.001) and less intra-operative fluid infusions (p < 0.001). Time of first flatus was shorter in the ERAS group, though no difference was found in timing of nasogastric tube removal and defecation. Removal of drainage was done significantly earlier in the ERAS group. The median length of stay decreased from 12 to 9 days (p = 0.003) with a significant reduction also in re-admission rates at 30 and long-term complications at 90 days from surgery.

conclusionThe application of an opioid-free ERAS protocol to patients undergoing open radical cystectomy was associated, as compared with prior traditional care, with significant reductions of recovery time and length of stay, number of total in-hospital complications, in particular functional ileus and re-admissions by 30 and 90 days after surgery.

Indexed as

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary DiversionCohort StudiesCystectomyHumansLength of StayObservational Studies as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsAcute kidney injuryEnhanced recovery after surgeryERAS protocolFunctional ileusOpioid-free anaesthesiaUrological complications

Identifiers

PMID37410103
OpenAlexW4383302279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.