ArticleeLife2023
Remapping in a recurrent neural network model of navigation and context inference.
Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coordinating Cognition: The Entorhinal Cortex in Mnemonic, Temporal and Spatial Representation.Cells · 2026Review
- Distributed neural codes of the 3D position in the marmoset frontal cortex and hippocampus.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Neural geometry in the human hippocampus enables generalization across spatial position and gaze.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Contextual inference through flexible integration of environmental features and behavioural outcomes.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- From sensory to perceptual manifolds: The twist of neural geometry.Science advances · 2025Article
- Three types of remapping with linear decoders: A population-geometric perspective.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Encoding of interdependent features of head direction and angular head velocity in navigation.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Three types of remapping with linear decoders: a population-geometric perspective.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurons in navigational brain regions provide information about position, orientation, and speed relative to environmental landmarks. These cells also change their firing patterns ('remap') in response to changing contextual factors such as environmental cues, task conditions, and behavioral states, which influence neural activity throughout the brain. How can navigational circuits preserve their local computations while responding to global context changes? To investigate this question, we trained recurrent neural network models to track position in simple environments while at the same time reporting transiently-cued context changes. We show that these combined task constraints (navigation and context inference) produce activity patterns that are qualitatively similar to population-wide remapping in the entorhinal cortex, a navigational brain region. Furthermore, the models identify a solution that generalizes to more complex navigation and inference tasks. We thus provide a simple, general, and experimentally-grounded model of remapping as one neural circuit performing both navigation and context inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.