Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37409922›Full record

ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2023

Comparison of open and closed burn wound dressing applications with tissue culture sampling.

Salih Tuncal, Saygın Altıner, Ender Ergüder, Çağrı Büyükkasap, Rifat Kuşabbi, Yılmaz Ünal

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Salih TuncalDepartment of General Surgery, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara-Türkiye.
Saygın AltınerDepartment of General Surgery, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara-Türkiye.
Ender ErgüderDepartment of General Surgery, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara-Türkiye.
Çağrı BüyükkasapDepartment of General Surgery, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara-Türkiye.
Rifat KuşabbiDepartment of General Surgery, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara-Türkiye.
Yılmaz ÜnalDepartment of General Surgery, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara-Türkiye.
Ministry of Health · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecondary infections are the leading cause of death in burn patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of open and closed burn dressings on the development of secondary infections.

methodsTissue cultures were obtained from the burn sites of 56 patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who were admitted to our burn unit between December 2022 and January 2023, on days 3 and 7. The impact of the demographic features of the patients, the characteristics of the burn wound, the dressing type, and the first intervention strategies given to the burn wound on the development of wound infection were evaluated.

resultsThere was no statistically significant difference between the open- and closed-dressing groups in terms of cultural positiv-ity (P>0.05). A statistically significant difference (P=0.019) was found between the groups in terms of culture positivity among those whose wounds were cleansed with warm water as the initial intervention after a burn and those whose wounds were not.

conclusionEven though the main impacts of the patient's variables on the development of a wound infection are recognized, it has been found that the appropriate and successful first intervention in a burn wound is also quite important.

Indexed as

CoinfectionWound InfectionBandagesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID37409922
PMCPMC10405029
OpenAlexW4383302341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.