Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37409920›Full record

ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2023

The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department.

Mustafa İçer, Ercan Gündüz, Mehmet Fatih Akkoç, Dicle Polat, Halime Özkan, Tuğçe Bayrak, Şilan Göger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mustafa İçerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır-Türkiye.
Ercan GündüzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır-Türkiye.
Mehmet Fatih AkkoçDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır-Türkiye.
Dicle PolatDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır-Türkiye.
Halime ÖzkanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır-Türkiye.
Tuğçe BayrakDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır-Türkiye.
Şilan GögerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır-Türkiye.
Dicle University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShock index (SI) is the ratio of heart rate (HR) to systolic blood pressure (SBP); modified SI (MSI) is the ratio of HR to mean arterial pressure; age SI (ASI) is age multiplied by SI; reverse SI (rSI) is the ratio of SBP to HR; and rSIG is rSI multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale Score (rSIG). Studies have proven that shock indices are good tools in predicting mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the shock indices SI, MSI, ASI, rSI, and rSIG in predicting mortality in burn patients.

methodsThis is a retrospective cross-sectional study. The vital signs of the patients were recorded and their shock indices were calculated at the time of emergency department admission. The effectiveness of the shock indices SI, MSI, ASI, rSI, and rSIG in predict-ing mortality was compared in the burn patients included in the study

resultsA total of 913 patients were enrolled. rSIG and MSI were the shock indices with the highest area under the curve (AUC) values in predicting mortality in the burn patients. The AUC values of rSIG and MSI were 0.829 (95% CI: 0.739-0.919, P<0.001) and 0.740 (95% CI: 0.643-0.838, P<0.001), respectively.

conclusionVital signs are easily recorded and shock indices are easily calculated at the time of admission of burn patients to the emergency department; they also effectively predict mortality. rSIG and MSI are the best mortality predictors among the shock indices examined in this study.

Indexed as

BurnsShockCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37409920
PMCPMC10405026
OpenAlexW4383302098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.