Observational studyUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2023
How did COVID-19 affect acute urolithiasis? An inner Anatolian experience.
Observational study in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has changed the number of patients seeking medical help from the emergency service (ES) with non-COVID complaints, consequencing in postponed presentations of different surgical and medical situations. Acute urinary stone disease is one of these situations and needs to be investigated in terms of the effect of COVID-19 on its presentation to the ES.
methodsIn this observational, retrospective, and single-center study, we scanned each abdominopelvic computed tomography requested in ES for possible acute urolithiasis during 1 year before and after the outbreak of COVID-19. We searched to state the number of abdominopelvic computed tomographies applied and the number of ratifying urinary stone positivity. We enrolled patients' gender, age, stone location, and stone size. We also recorded C-reactive protein, leukocyte count, and creatinine and noted how long the patients suffering from pain, the duration until the intervention, and the management option selected for each case.
resultsTotal number of abdominopelvic computed tomographies performed was 1089. Of these, 517 were pre-pandemic and 572 were peri-pandemic. The number of pre and peri-pandemic stone-positive scans were, respectively, 363 (70.2%) and 379 (66.2%) (P=0.643). The females' percentage in the COVID-19 period (37.2%) was significantly lower than in the pre-pandemic period (54.3%) (P=0.013). The median size of ureter stones of the pre and peri-pandemic groups were, respectively, 4.8 mm and 3.9 mm depicting no significant difference (P=0.197). No significant difference was sighted between the pre and peri-pandemic groups concerning stone locations, blood parameters, painful duration, treatment options, and time to intervention.
conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in neither sicker nor fewer patients suffering from acute ureteric colic in the ES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.