ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2023
Intraocular foreign body in the anterior chamber angle misdiagnosed as herpetic stromal keratitis.
Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Herpes simplex keratitis: A brief clinical overview.World journal of virology · 2024Review
- Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a case of a metallic intraocular foreign body (IOFB) retained in the anterior chamber (AC) angle that was masquerading as herpetic stromal keratitis. A 41-year-old male construction worker was referred to our ophthalmology clinic with the complaint of consistent blurred vision for 3 days in his left eye. He had no history of ocular trauma. The best-corrected visual acuity was found to be 10/10 in the right eye and 8/10 in the left eye. On slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment, the right eye was normal, while the left eye showed unilateral corneal edema and scarring, anterior lens capsule opacification, +2 cells in the AC, and the Seidel test was negative. Fundus examination was normal bilaterally. Despite there not being history of it, we still suspected ocular trauma considering the patient's occupational risk. Consequently, an orbital computed tomography imaging was performed which revealed a metallic-IOFB in the inferior iridocorneal angle. On the second follow-up day, the corneal edema regressed, and a gonioscopic examination of the affected eye was performed, showing a small foreign body embedded in the inferior iridocorneal angle of the AC. Subsequently, the IOFB was surgically removed using Barkan lens, and excellent visual results were achieved. This case emphasizes the importance of considering IOFB in the differential diagnosis of patients with unilateral corneal edema and anterior lens capsule opacification. Fur-thermore, the presence of IOFB should be definitely excluded in patients with occupational risk of ocular trauma even if there is no history of trauma. More awareness about the proper use of eye protection should be raised to circumvent penetrating ocular-trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.