ArticleJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2023
Evolution of endovascular therapy trials for basilar artery occlusion.
Article in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Current Evidence and Evolving Practices.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Endovascular Therapy in Patients With Sudden Versus Nonsudden Onset of Basilar Artery Occlusion Symptoms.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Endovascular treatment for basilar artery occlusion: whether the "weekend effect" affects time metrics and clinical outcomes at a comprehensive stroke center.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- First-Line Stent Retriever Versus Contact Aspiration or Combined Technique for Endovascular Therapy of Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke: The PLATO Study.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is an uncommon event, and leads to poor outcome in an estimated 60 to 80% of patients. Two early randomized trials, BASICS and BEST demonstrated equivocal benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) compared to medical management. These trials helped in forming the design, sample size and eligibility criteria for the subsequent two trials, ATTENTION and BAOCHE which demonstrated superiority of EVT over medical management. In this commentary, we look at the evolution of how early BAO studies formed the building blocks for successive BAO trials, review lessons learned, and opportunities for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.